首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Family Medicine >Primary Care Economic Barriers to Health Care and Use of Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests Among Medicare Enrollees Over Time
【2h】

Primary Care Economic Barriers to Health Care and Use of Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests Among Medicare Enrollees Over Time

机译:基本医疗保健医疗保健的经济壁垒以及随着时间的推移在Medicare参加者中使用大肠癌筛查测试

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>PURPOSE Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening remains underutilized. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of primary care and economic barriers to health care on CRC testing relative to the 2001 Medicare expansion of screening coverage.>METHODS Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey data were use to study community-dwelling enrollees aged 65 to 80 years, free of renal disease and CRC, and who participated in the survey in 2000 (n = 8,330), 2003 (n = 7,889), or 2005 (n = 7,614). Three outcomes were examined: colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy within 5 years (recent endoscopy), endoscopy more than 5 years previously, and fecal occult blood test (FOBT) within 2 years.>RESULTS Endoscopy use increased and FOBT use decreased during the 6-year period, with no significant independent differences between those receiving care from primary care physicians and those receiving care from other physicians. Beneficiaries without a usual place of health care were the least likely to undergo CRC testing, and that gap widened with time: adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.27 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19–0.39) for FOBT, and AOR = 0.35 (95% CI, 0.27–0.46) for endoscopy in 2000 compared with AOR = 0.18 (95% CI, 0.11–0.30) for FOBT and AOR = 0.22 (95% CI, 0.17–0.30) for endoscopy in 2005. Disparities in use of recent endoscopy by type of health insurance coverage in both 2000 and 2005 were greater for enrollees with a high school education or higher than they were for less-educated enrollees. There were no statistically significant differences by delayed care due to cost after adjustment for health insurance.>CONCLUSION Despite expanding coverage for screening, complex CRC screening disparities persisted based on differences in the usual place and cost of health care, type of health insurance coverage, and level of education.
机译:>目的:结直肠癌(CRC)筛查仍未得到充分利用。这项研究的目的是研究相对于2001年Medicare筛查覆盖面的扩大,初级保健和经济障碍对CRC检测的影响。>方法 Medicare当前受益人调查数据用于研究社区年龄在65至80岁之间,没有肾脏疾病和CRC的入选者,他们分别于2000年(n = 8,330),2003(n = 7,889)或2005(n = 7,614)参加了调查。检查了三个结局:5年内进行结肠镜检查/乙状结肠镜检查(最近的内窥镜检查),5年前使用内窥镜检查和2年内进行粪便潜血试验(FOBT)。>结果内窥镜检查使用量增加而FOBT使用量减少在六年期间,接受初级保健医生照料的人与接受其他医生照料的人之间没有显着的独立差异。没有常规卫生保健场所的受益人接受CRC测试的可能性最小,并且该差距随时间而扩大:FOBT和AOR的调整后优势比(AOR)= 0.27(95%置信区间[CI],0.19-0.39) 2000年,内窥镜检查= 0.35(95%CI,0.27–0.46),而FOBT的AOR = 0.18(95%CI,0.11-0.30),2005年内窥镜检查的AOR = 0.22(95%CI,0.17–0.30)。在2000年和2005年,按健康保险覆盖率分类的近期内窥镜检查的使用率,高于受过高等教育的入学人数高于受教育程度较低的入学人数。调整健康保险后,因费用而导致的延误护理没有统计学上的显着差异。健康保险的类型和受教育程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号