...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of psychoeducational assessment >Validity and Reliability of Gifted Rating Scales-School Form in Sample of Teachers and Parents - A Czech Contribution
【24h】

Validity and Reliability of Gifted Rating Scales-School Form in Sample of Teachers and Parents - A Czech Contribution

机译:在教师和父母样本中有天赋评级秤学校形式的有效性和可靠性 - 捷克贡献

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The factor structure, the concurrent validity, and test-retest reliability of the Czech translation of the Gifted Rating Scales-School Form [GRS-S; Pfeiffer, S. I., & Jarosewich, T. (2003). GRS (gifted rating scales) - manual. Pearson] were evaluated. Ten alternative models were tested. Four models were found to exhibit acceptable fit and interpretability. The factor structure was comparable for both parent (n = 277) and teacher raters (n = 137). High correlations between the factors suggest that raters might be subject to a halo effect. Ratings made by teachers show a closer relationship with criteria (WJ IE II COG, CFT 20-R, and TIM3-5) than ratings made by parents. Test-retest reliability of teacher rating (with median 93 days) was quite high for all GRS-S subscales (r = .84-.87).
机译:评估了资优评定量表(GRS-S;Pfeiffer,S.I.&Jarosewich,T.(2003)。GRS(资优评定量表)-手册。皮尔逊)的捷克翻译版的因子结构、同时效度和重测信度。测试了10种替代模型。发现四个模型具有可接受的拟合度和可解释性。家长(n=277)和教师评分员(n=137)的因子结构具有可比性。这些因素之间的高度相关性表明,评分者可能会受到光环效应的影响。与家长评分相比,教师评分与标准(WJ IE II COG、CFT 20-R和TIM3-5)的关系更密切。在所有GRS-S分量表中,教师评分的重测信度(中位数93天)都相当高(r=.84-.87)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号