...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of oncology: official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology >Phase II randomized multicenter study evaluating a treatment regimen alternating docetaxel and cisplatin-vinorelbine with a cisplatin-vinorelbine control group in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: GFPC 97.01 study.
【24h】

Phase II randomized multicenter study evaluating a treatment regimen alternating docetaxel and cisplatin-vinorelbine with a cisplatin-vinorelbine control group in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: GFPC 97.01 study.

机译:II期随机多中心研究,评估多西他赛和顺铂-长春瑞滨交替治疗与顺铂-长春瑞滨对照组的IV期非小细胞肺癌患者的治疗方案:GFPC 97.01研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The potential absence of cross-resistance between cisplatin and docetaxel in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) suggests that alternating regimens of cisplatin-based chemotherapy and docetaxel might increase the activity of chemotherapy in stage IV NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Randomized, multicenter, non-comparative phase II study in patients with stage IV NSCLC (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2). Patients randomized to alternating treatment group (A) received docetaxel 100 mg/m2 on days (D) 1 and 43 alternating with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on D22 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 on D22, D29 and D36. Those randomized to the control group (B) received cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on D1, D22 and D43 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 once a week from D1 to D57. Treatment was continued for a further 6 weeks in the event of objective response or stabilization. RESULTS: Seventy patients were enrolled (group A: 38, group B: 32). More premature treatment discontinuations due to toxicity were observed in group A (median number of cycles: 3) than in group B (median number of cycles: 5). The intention-to-treat objective response rate was 10.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.8% to 20.8%] in group A compared with 25% (95% CI 10% to 40%) in group B, the median time to treatment failure being 10.2 weeks and 17.3 weeks, respectively. The median survival and 1-year survival were 29.1 weeks and 39% in group A compared with 41.6 weeks and 42% in group B. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 5.9 and 4.9% of the cycles in group A and group B, respectively. Non-hematological toxicity was moderate in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of docetaxel alternating with cisplatin-vinorelbine did not enhance the activity of this combination. The development of sequential regimens might be a more promising way of exploiting the absence of cross-resistance between these two drugs.
机译:背景:在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中,顺铂和多西他赛之间可能没有交叉耐药性,这表明基于顺铂的化疗和多西他赛的交替治疗方案可能会增加IV期非小细胞肺癌的化疗活性。患者和方法:IV期NSCLC(东部合作肿瘤小组的工作状态为0-2)的患者,随机,多中心,非比较II期研究。随机分配到交替治疗组(A)的患者在(D)1和43天接受多西他赛100 mg / m2,在D22接受顺铂100 mg / m2,在D22,D29和D36接受长春瑞滨30 mg / m2交替服用。随机分配到对照组(B)的患者每周从D1到D57接受D1,D22和D43上的顺铂80 mg / m2和长春瑞滨30 mg / m2。如果出现客观反应或稳定,则继续治疗另外6周。结果:入组患者70例(A组:38例,B组:32例)。与B组(中位周期数:5)相比,A组(中位周期数:3)观察到由于毒性导致的过早停药。 A组的意向性治疗客观反应率为10.8%[95%置信区间(CI)0.8%至20.8%],而B组的中位时间为25%(95%CI 10%至40%)治疗失败的时间分别为10.2周和17.3周。 A组中位生存期和1年生存期分别为29.1周和39%,而B组为41.6周和42%。A组和B组分别在5.9和4.9%的周期中出现发热性中性粒细胞减少。两组的非血液学毒性均中等。结论:多西他赛与顺铂-长春瑞滨交替使用并不能增强该组合的活性。顺序方案的开发可能是利用这两种药物之间不存在交叉耐药性的一种更有希望的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号