首页> 外文期刊>Analytical methods >Validation of an analytical method for the refractive index measurement of glass fragments. Application to a hit-and-run incident
【24h】

Validation of an analytical method for the refractive index measurement of glass fragments. Application to a hit-and-run incident

机译:用于玻璃碎片折射率测量的分析方法的验证。适用于撞车事故

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A method to determine the refractive index (Rl) of glass samples was validated in this research article. This validation was performed by studying analytical features such as the working range, precision, robustness, and bias. Locke silicone oil type B, glass standards type B and a sodium D source (589.3 nm) were chosen for a working Rl range from 1.50225 to 1.52381, according to the typical Rl values of glass samples of forensic interest. Robustness, calculated as Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) of slopes of ten calibration lines within a period of one month was 0.24%. Precision of the method (calculated for the two extreme glass standards B2 and B12 in the working range) was 0.21% and 0.14% (repeatability) and 0.12% and 0.09% (intermediate precision), respectively. A Certified Reference Material (CRM) of glass of known Rl was employed to estimate the bias of the method, verifying a relative error of 0.00066%. The method was applied to eight validation samples (six glass fragments from different parts of an automobile, a glass container and an architectural tinted window), which were differentiated through their Rl values. Finally, the procedure was applied to interpret the origin of glass evidence taken from a hit-and-run incident. A common origin of recovered and control glass fragments was supposed on the basis of the Rl determination of these samples, together with the application of useful match criteria in forensic pairwise comparisons of glass fragments. Results were confirmed by means of a highly discriminatory technique such as Laser Ablation-lnductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS).
机译:本研究文章验证了确定玻璃样品折射率(R1)的方法。通过研究分析特性(例如工作范围,精度,鲁棒性和偏差)来执行此验证。根据法医感兴趣的玻璃样品的典型R1值,选择B型洛克有机硅油,B型玻璃标准液和钠D源(589.3 nm),其工作R1范围为1.50225至1.52381。一个月内十条校准线的斜率的相对标准偏差(RSD)计算得出的稳健性为0.24%。该方法的精度(在工作范围内对两种极限玻璃标准品B2和B12计算)分别为0.21%和0.14%(重复性)和0.12%和0.09%(中等精度)。采用已知R1的玻璃标准参比材料(CRM)估算方法的偏差,从而验证相对误差为0.00066%。将该方法应用于八个验证样本(来自汽车不同部位的六个玻璃碎片,一个玻璃容器和一个有色玻璃窗),这些样本通过其R1值进行区分。最后,该程序用于解释从一次撞车事件中获取的玻璃证据的来源。基于这些样品的RI测定,以及在玻璃碎片的法医成对比较中有用的匹配标准的应用,假定回收和对照玻璃碎片的共同来源。通过高度区分性技术(例如激光烧蚀-电感耦合等离子体质谱法(LA-ICP-MS))证实了结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号