...
【24h】

Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review

机译:解剖学教学中的最佳教学实践:评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this report we review the range of teaching resources and strategies used in anatomy education with the aim of coming up with suggestions about the best teaching practices in this area. There is much debate about suitable methods of delivering anatomical knowledge. Competent clinicians, particularly surgeons, need a deep understanding of anatomy for safe clinical procedures. However, because students have had very limited exposure to anatomy during clinical training, there is a concern that medical students are ill-prepared in anatomy when entering clerkships and residency programs. Therefore, developing effective modalities for teaching anatomy is essential to safe medical practice. Cadaver-based instruction has survived as the main instructional tool for hundreds of years, however, there are differing views on whether full cadaver dissection is still appropriate for a modern undergraduate training. The limitations on curricular time, trained anatomy faculty and resources for gross anatomy courses in integrated or/and system-based curricula, have led many medical schools to abandon costly and time-consuming dissection-based instruction in favour of alternative methods of instruction including prosection, medical imaging, living anatomy and multimedia resources. To date, no single teaching tool has been found to meet curriculum requirements. The best way to teach modern anatomy is by combining multiple pedagogical resources to complement one another, students appear to learn more effectively when multimodal and system-based approaches are integrated. Our review suggests that certain professions would have more benefit from certain educational methods or strategies than others. Full body dissection would be best reserved for medical students, especially those with surgical career intentions, while teaching based on prosections and plastination is more suitable for dental, pharmacy and allied health science students. There is a need to direct future research towards evaluation of the suitability of the new teaching methodologies in new curricula and student perceptions of integrated and multimodal teaching paradigms, and the ability of these to satisfy learning outcomes. (C) 2016 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
机译:在本报告中,我们回顾了解剖学教学中使用的教学资源和策略的范围,以期提出有关该领域最佳教学实践的建议。关于传递解剖学知识的合适方法的争论很多。合格的临床医生,特别是外科医生,需要对解剖结构有深入的了解,以确保安全的临床程序。但是,由于学生在临床培训期间接触解剖的机会非常有限,因此存在一种担心,即医学学生在进入职员和居住项目时在解剖方面的准备不足。因此,开发有效的解剖学教学方法对于安全的医学实践至关重要。基于尸体的教学已经作为主要的教学工具幸存了数百年,但是,对于完全的尸体解剖是否仍适合现代本科生培训,存在不同的看法。由于课程时间的限制,训练有素的解剖学教师以及基于综合课程和/或基于系统的课程中的整体解剖学课程的资源,导致许多医学院放弃了昂贵且耗时的解剖学教学,转而采用包括前列腺切除术在内的其他教学方法,医学影像,活体解剖和多媒体资源。迄今为止,还没有找到一种能够满足课程要求的教学工具。教授现代解剖学的最好方法是将多种教学资源相结合,相辅相成,综合多模式和基于系统的方法,学生似乎会更有效地学习。我们的评论表明,某些职业比其他职业将从某些教育方法或策略中受益更多。全身解剖将最适合医学专业的学生,​​尤其是那些有外科职业意图的学生,而基于前列腺和塑化的教学更适合牙科,药学和相关健康科学专业的学生。有必要将未来的研究直接用于评估新课程中新教学方法的适用性以及学生对集成和多模式教学范式的理解,以及这些方法满足学习成果的能力。 (C)2016 Elsevier GmbH。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号