首页> 外文期刊>BMJ quality & safety >Diagnosing a learning practice: the validity and reliability of a learning practice inventory.
【24h】

Diagnosing a learning practice: the validity and reliability of a learning practice inventory.

机译:诊断学习实践:学习实践清单的有效性和可靠性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing literature on learning organisations as a way of fostering communication, teamwork, collaboration and collective learning, thereby promoting quality improvement and enhancing patient safety. An increasing number of instruments are being developed in an attempt to measure learning organisation characteristics. However, the majority of these tools are created for a business setting, have not been scientifically tested and have not been applied in healthcare. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate elements of the validity and reliability of an instrument (ie, learning practice inventory (LPI)) for diagnosing learning practice characteristics in primary healthcare. METHOD: Content validity was evaluated using a modified nominal group technique and a content validity rating scale. Construct validity and reliability evaluation was undertaken with 10 staff members from 10 general practices in the west of Scotland. Staff completed the inventory twice, 4-6 weeks apart. Applying generalisability theory, a variance component analysis was performed. RESULTS: The main findings present evidence that the inventory has acceptable reliability and content validity. The results also demonstrate that the inventory can reflect the consistent and uniquely different perspectives of particular designations of staff within a practice. It is possible to compare practices' overall learning environments and to identify specific areas of practice strength as well as areas for development. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the psychometric properties of a learning practice diagnostic inventory. It highlights the consistently different perspectives that individual staff groups have on the function of their practice, suggesting that the success of quality improvement initiatives may be compromised without the involvement and true engagement of each staff group.
机译:背景:关于学习型组织的文献越来越多,可作为一种促进沟通,团队合作,协作和集体学习的方式,从而促进质量改善和提高患者安全性。为了测量学习组织的特征,正在开发越来越多的工具。但是,这些工具中的大多数是为业务环境创建的,尚未经过科学测试,也未在医疗保健中应用。目的:评估用于诊断初级保健中学习行为特征的工具(即学习行为清单(LPI))的有效性和可靠性。方法:使用改良的名义组技术和内容有效性评定量表对内容有效性进行评估。苏格兰西部10个地区的10名工作人员对建筑进行了有效性和可靠性评估。工作人员完成了两次库存,相隔4-6周。应用一般性理论,进行了方差成分分析。结果:主要发现提供了证据,证明该清单具有可接受的可靠性和内容有效性。结果还表明,清单可以反映实践中特定工作人员的一致而独特的不同观点。可以比较实践的整体学习环境,并确定实践实力的特定领域以及发展领域。结论:本研究证明了学习实践诊断清单的心理计量学特性。它强调了各个工作人员对实践职能的一致看法,这表明,如果没有每个工作人员的参与和真正参与,可能会损害质量改进计划的成功。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号