首页> 外文期刊>BMJ quality & safety >Reducing unnecessary urinary Catheter use and other strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection: An integrative review
【24h】

Reducing unnecessary urinary Catheter use and other strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection: An integrative review

机译:减少不必要的导尿管使用和其他策略来预防与导管相关的尿路感染:综合审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) are costly, common and often preventable by reducing unnecessary urinary catheter (UC) use. Methods: To summarise interventions to reduce UC use and CAUTIs, we updated a prior systematic review (through October 2012), and a meta-analysis regarding interventions prompting UC removal by reminders or stop orders. A narrative review summarises other CAUTI prevention strategies including aseptic insertion, catheter maintenance, antimicrobial UCs, and bladder bundle implementation. Results: 30 studies were identified and summarised with interventions to prompt removal of UCs, with potential for inclusion in the meta-analyses. By meta-analysis (11 studies), the rate of CAUTI (episodes per 1000 catheterdays) was reduced by 53% (rate ratio 0.47; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.64, p<0.001) using a reminder or stop order, with five studies also including interventions to decrease initial UC placement. The pooled (nine studies) standardised mean difference (SMD) in catheterisation duration (days) was -1.06 overall (p=0.065) including a statistically significant decrease in stop-order studies (SMD -0.37; p<0.001) but not in reminder studies (SMD, -1.54; p=0.071). No significant harm from catheter removal strategies is supported. Limited research is available regarding the impact of UC insertion and maintenance technique. A recent randomised controlled trial indicates antimicrobial catheters provide no significant benefit in preventing symptomatic CAUTIs. Conclusions: UC reminders and stop orders appear to reduce CAUTI rates and should be used to improve patient safety. Several evidencebased guidelines have evaluated CAUTI preventive strategies as well as emerging evidence regarding intervention bundles. Implementation strategies are important because reducing UC use involves changing wellestablished habits.
机译:背景:与导管相关的尿路感染(CAUTI)昂贵,常见且通常可以通过减少不必要的导尿管(UC)使用来预防。方法:为了总结减少UC使用和CAUTI的干预措施,我们更新了之前的系统评价(截止到2012年10月),并进行了有关通过提示或停止订单促使UC移除的干预措施的荟萃分析。叙述性综述总结了其他CAUTI预防策略,包括无菌插入,导管维护,抗菌UC和膀胱束实施。结果:鉴定并总结了30项研究,并进行了干预,以迅速移除UC,并可能纳入荟萃分析。通过荟萃分析(11项研究),使用提醒或停止顺序,CAUTI的发生率(每1000个导管日的发作数)降低了53%(比率0.47; 95%CI 0.30至0.64,p <0.001),涉及五项研究还包括减少初始UC放置的干预措施。汇总的(九项研究)导管插入持续时间(天)的标准化平均差(SMD)总体为-1.06(p = 0.065),包括停诊研究的统计学显着下降(SMD -0.37; p <0.001),但没有提醒研究(SMD,-1.54; p = 0.071)。不支持从导管移除策略中获得重大伤害。关于UC插入和维护技术的影响的研究有限。最近的一项随机对照试验表明,抗菌导管在预防症状性CAUTI方面没有显着益处。结论:UC提醒和停药令似乎降低了CAUTI率,应用于提高患者安全性。一些基于证据的指南评估了CAUTI的预防策略以及有关干预措施的新兴证据。实施策略很重要,因为减少UC的使用会涉及改变良好的习惯。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号