...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Physiology >Circulating endothelial progenitor cells are not affected by acute systemic inflammation
【24h】

Circulating endothelial progenitor cells are not affected by acute systemic inflammation

机译:循环内皮祖细胞不受急性全身炎症的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Vascular injury causes acute systemic inflammation and mobilizes endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and endothelial cell (EC) colony-forming units (EC-CFUs). Whether such mobilization occurs as part of a nonspecific acute phase response or is a phenomenon specific to vascular injury remains unclear. We aimed to determine the effect of acute systemic inflammation on EPCs and EC-CFU mobilization in the absence of vascular injury. Salmonella typhus vaccination was used as a model of acute systemic inflammation. In a double-blind randomized crossover study, 12 healthy volunteers received S. typhus vaccination or placebo. Phenotypic EPC populations enumerated by flow cytometry [CD34+VEGF receptor (VEGF)R-2+CD133+, CD14+VEGFR-2+Tie2+, CD45?CD34+, as a surrogate for late outgrowth EPCs, and CD34+CXCR-4+], EC-CFUs, and serum cytokine concentrations (high sensitivity C-reactive protein, IL-6, and stromal-derived factor-1) were quantified during the first 7 days. Vaccination increased circulating leukocyte (9.8 ± 0.6 vs. 5.1 ± 0.2 × 109 cells/l, P < 0.0001), serum IL-6 [0.95 (0–1.7) vs. 0 (0–0) ng/l, P = 0.016], and VEGF-A [60 (45–94) vs. 43 (21–64) pg/l, P = 0.006] concentrations at 6 h and serum high sensitivity C-reactive protein at 24 h [2.7 (1.4–3.6) vs. 0.4 (0.2–0.8) mg/l, P = 0.037]. Vaccination caused a 56.7 ± 7.6% increase in CD14+ cells at 6 h (P < 0.001) and a 22.4 ± 6.9% increase in CD34+ cells at 7 days (P = 0.04). EC-CFUs, putative vascular progenitors, and the serum stromal-derived factor-1 concentration were unaffected throughout the study period (P > 0.05 for all). In conclusion, acute systemic inflammation causes nonspecific mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells, although it does not selectively mobilize putative vascular progenitors. We suggest that systemic inflammation is not the primary stimulus for EPC mobilization after acute vascular injury.
机译:血管损伤导致急性全身炎症,动员内皮祖细胞(EPC)和内皮细胞(EC)形成单位(EC-CFU)。是否作为非特异性急性阶段反应的一部分发生这种动员,或者是血管损伤特异性的现象尚不清楚。我们旨在确定急性全身炎症对血管损伤没有血管损伤的EPC和EC-CFU动员的影响。 Salmonella Typhus疫苗接种用作急性全身炎症的模型。在双盲随机交叉研究中,12名健康志愿者接受了伤寒疫苗接种或安慰剂。流式细胞术中枚举的表型EPC群体[CD34 + VEGF受体(VEGF)R-2 + CD133 +,CD14 + VEGFR-2 + TIE2 +,CD45ΔCD34+,作为晚期产卵EPC的替代物,CD34 + CXCR-4 +],在前7天内定量了EC-CFU和血清细胞因子浓度(高灵敏度C-反应蛋白,IL-6和基质衍生因子-1)。疫苗接种增加循环白细胞(9.8±0.6对5.1±0.2×109个单元/ L,P <0.0001),血清IL-6 [0.95(0-1.7)与0(0-0)Ng / L,P = 0.016 ]和VEGF-A [60(45-94)与43(21-64)pg / L,p = 0.006]浓度为6小时,24小时,血清高灵敏度C-反应蛋白[2.7(1.4-3.6 )与0.4(0.2-0.8)mg / L,p = 0.037]。疫苗接种在6小时(P <0.001)的CD14 +细胞增加56.7±7.6%,7天在CD34 +细胞增加22.4±6.9%(P = 0.04)。 EC-CFU,推定的血管祖细胞和血清基质衍生因子-1浓度在整个研究期间不受影响(全部P> 0.05)。总之,急性全身炎症导致非特异性动员造血祖细胞,尽管它没有选择性地动员推定的血管祖细胞。我们认为全身炎症不是急性血管损伤后EPC动员的主要刺激。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号