...
首页> 外文期刊>Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Prophylactic Use of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death in Dialysis Patients The Prospective, Randomized, Controlled ICD2 Trial
【24h】

Prophylactic Use of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death in Dialysis Patients The Prospective, Randomized, Controlled ICD2 Trial

机译:预防性使用植入式心脏除颤器在预防透析患者突然心脏死亡中的前瞻性,随机,控制的ICD2试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Patients with end-stage renal disease who are undergoing dialysis are reported to be at high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD), and to date, no therapy has been shown to be effective in reducing this risk. The feasibility and value of prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation to prevent SCD is uncertain. METHODS: We conducted the ICD2 trial (Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Dialysis Patients), a prospective, randomized, controlled study investigating the value and safety of ICD implantation to prevent SCD in 200 patients on dialysis with a left ventricular ejection fraction = 35%, after adequate screening and optimization of other treatments. The primary end point was SCD. Secondary end points were all-cause mortality and ICD-related complications. RESULTS: The trial was stopped as per the recommendation of the data and safety monitoring board for futility reasons after inclusion of 188 patients, 97 in the ICD group and 91 in the control group. The median duration of follow-up was 6.8 years (interquartile range, 3.8-8.8 years). SCD occurred in 19 of 188 cases (10.1%), 11 of 97 in the ICD group and 8 of 91 in the control group. The cumulative SCD incidence at 5 years was 9.7% (95% CI, 3.3%-16.2%) in the ICD group and 7.9% (95% CI, 1.7-14.0%) in the control group, resulting in a hazard ratio of 1.32 (95% CI, 0.53-3.29; P= 0.55). Overall, 99 of 188 patients died (52.7%), 52 in the ICD group and 47 in the control group. Five-year survival probability was 50.6% (95% CI, 39.8%-61.5%) in the ICD group and 54.5% (95% CI, 43.0-66.0%) in the control group, resulting in a hazard ratio of 1.02 (95% CI, 0.69-1.52; P= 0.92). Among 80 patients who received an ICD, 25 adverse events related to ICD implantation occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In a well-screened and well-treated population undergoing dialysis, prophylactic ICD therapy did not reduce the rate of SCD or all-cause mortality, which remained high. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www. controlled-trials. com. Unique identifier: ISRCTN20479861.
机译:背景:据报道,透析透析的末期肾病的患者患有突然心脏死亡(SCD)的高风险,并且迄今为止,没有显示治疗可有效降低这种风险。预防性植入式心脏除颤器(ICD)植入防止SCD的可行性和价值是不确定的。方法:我们在透析患者中​​进行ICD2试验(植入的心脏病 - 除颤器),预期,随机,对照研究,调查ICD植入的价值和安全,以防止200名患者的SCD在透析效应= 35%= 35%在足够的筛选和优化其他治疗后。主要终点是SCD。次要终点是全部导致死亡率和ICD相关的并发症。结果:根据数据和安全监测委员会的建议停止审判,以便在纳入188名患者,ICD集团97岁及对照组中的97名患者之后进行无用的原因。后续行动的中位数为6.8年(四分位数,3.8-8.8岁)。 SCD发生在198例(10.1%),ICD组中的11个,共97例,41个中的第81次,中有91例。在ICD组5岁的累积SCD发病率为9.7%(95%CI,3.3%-16.2%),对照组中7.9%(95%CI,1.7-14.0%),导致危险比为1.32 (95%CI,0.53-3.29; p = 0.55)。总体而言,188名患者的99名患者(52.7%),ICD组中的52例,47例在对照组中。 ICD组的五年存活概率为50.6%(95%CI,39.8%-61.5%),对照组54.5%(95%CI,43.0-66.0%),导致危险比为1.02(95 %CI,0.69-1.52; p = 0.92)。在接受ICD的80名患者中,发生了与ICD植入有关的25例不良事件。结论:在透析透析的良好良好良好的群体中,预防性ICD治疗没有降低SCD或全因死亡率的速度,这仍然很高。临床试验注册:URL:http:// www。对照试验。 COM。唯一标识符:ISRCTN20479861。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号