首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesiology >Reversal of profound rocuronium-induced blockade with sugammadex: a randomized comparison with neostigmine.
【24h】

Reversal of profound rocuronium-induced blockade with sugammadex: a randomized comparison with neostigmine.

机译:Sugammadex逆转了由罗库溴铵引起的深刻阻断:与新斯的明的随机比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, reversal of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents was achieved using acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, but these are unable to adequately reverse profound blockade. Sugammadex is a novel reversal agent, reversing the effects of rocuronium by encapsulation. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of sugammadex versus neostigmine for reversal of profound rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade. METHODS: This phase III, randomized study enrolled surgical patients, aged 18 yr or older with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-IV. Patients were randomized to receive sugammadex (4.0 mg/kg) or neostigmine (70 microg/kg) plus glycopyrrolate (14 microg/kg). Anesthetized patients received an intubating dose of rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg), with maintenance doses (0.15 mg/kg) as required. Neuromuscular monitoring was performed by acceleromyography. Sugammadex or neostigmine was administered at reappearance of 1-2 posttetanic counts (profound neuromuscular blockade). The primary efficacy parameter was the time from sugammadex or neostigmine-glycopyrrolate administration to return of the train-of-four ratio to 0.9. RESULTS: In the intent-to-treat population (n = 37 in each group), geometric mean time to recovery to a train-of-four ratio of 0.9 with sugammadex was 2.9 min versus 50.4 min with neostigmine-glycopyrrolate (P < 0.0001) (median, 2.7 min vs. 49.0 min). Most sugammadex patients (97%) recovered to a train-of-four ratio of 0.9 within 5 min after administration. In contrast, most neostigmine patients (73%) recovered between 30 and 60 min after administration, with 23% requiring more than 60 min to recover to a train-of-four ratio of 0.9. CONCLUSIONS: Recovery from profound rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade was significantly faster with sugammadex versus with neostigmine, suggesting that sugammadex has a unique ability to rapidly reverse profound rocuronium neuromuscular blockade.
机译:背景:传统上,使用乙酰胆碱酯酶抑制剂可逆转非去极化神经肌肉阻滞剂,但这些不能充分逆转深层阻滞。 Sugammadex是一种新型的逆转剂,可通过封装逆转罗库溴铵的作用。这项研究评估了舒美葡糖和新斯的明对逆转罗库溴铵所致的神经肌肉阻滞的有效性和安全性。方法:该III期随机研究招募了年龄在18岁或以上且美国麻醉医师学会I-IV身体状况的手术患者。患者被随机分配接受sugammadex(4.0 mg / kg)或新斯的明(70 microg / kg)加上格隆溴铵(14 microg / kg)。麻醉后的患者接受插管剂量的罗库溴铵(0.6 mg / kg),并根据需要维持剂量(0.15 mg / kg)。神经肌肉监测通过加速肌电图进行。 Sugammadex或neostigmine在1-2次强直计数重新出现后(深层神经肌肉阻滞)给药。主要功效参数是从给予舒马地葡糖或新斯的明-氨基葡萄糖吡咯盐至四轮比恢复至0.9的时间。结果:在意向性治疗人群中(每组n = 37),使用舒美糊精恢复到四级训练比率为0.9的几何平均时间为2.9分钟,而使用新斯的明-格隆溴铵为50.4分钟(P <0.0001) )(中位数为2.7分钟vs. 49.0分钟)。多数舒美葡聚糖患者(97%)在用药后5分钟内恢复到四联比为0.9。相比之下,大多数新斯的明患者(73%)在用药后30至60分钟内恢复,其中23%的患者需要60分钟以上才能恢复到四链比率为0.9。结论:与新斯的明相比,sugammadex可以从罗库溴铵引起的深刻神经肌肉阻滞中恢复得更快,这表明sugammadex具有快速逆转罗库溴铵引起的深层神经肌肉阻滞的独特能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号