...
首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesiology >Epidural steroid injections, conservative treatment, or combination treatment for cervical radicular pain: A multicenter, randomized, comparative-effectiveness study
【24h】

Epidural steroid injections, conservative treatment, or combination treatment for cervical radicular pain: A multicenter, randomized, comparative-effectiveness study

机译:硬膜外类固醇注射,保守治疗或联合治疗可减轻颈椎放射性疼痛:一项多中心,随机,比较疗效研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Cervical radicular pain is a major cause of disability. No studies have been published comparing different types of nonsurgical therapy.Methods: A comparative-effectiveness study was performed in 169 patients with cervical radicular pain less than 4 yr in duration. Participants received nortriptyline and/or gabapentin plus physical therapies, up to three cervical epidural steroid injections (ESI) or combination treatment over 6 months. The primary outcome measure was average arm pain on a 0 to 10 scale at 1 month.Results: One-month arm pain scores were 3.5 (95% CI, 2.8 to 4.2) in the combination group, 4.2 (CI, 2.8 to 4.2) in ESI patients, and 4.3 (CI, 2.8 to 4.2) in individuals treated conservatively (P = 0.26). Combination group patients experienced a mean reduction of -3.1 (95% CI, -3.8 to -2.3) in average arm pain at 1 month versus -1.8 (CI, -2.5 to -1.2) in the conservative group and -2.0 (CI, -2.7 to -1.3) in ESI patients (P = 0.035). For neck pain, a mean reduction of -2.2 (95% CI, -3.0 to -1.5) was noted in combination patients versus -1.2 (CI, -1.9 to -0.5) in conservative group patients and -1.1 (CI, -1.8 to -0.4) in those who received ESI; P = 0.064). Three-month posttreatment, 56.9% of patients treated with combination therapy experienced a positive outcome versus 26.8% in the conservative group and 36.7% in ESI patients (P = 0.006).Conclusions: For the primary outcome measure, no significant differences were found between treatments, although combination therapy provided better improvement than stand-Alone treatment on some measures. Whereas these results suggest an interdisciplinary approach to neck pain may improve outcomes, confirmatory studies are needed.
机译:背景:颈椎神经根疼痛是致残的主要原因。方法:对169例持续时间少于4年的颈椎根性疼痛患者进行了比较效果研究。参加者在六个月内接受了去甲替林和/或加巴喷丁加物理疗法,多达三次宫颈硬膜外类固醇注射(ESI)或联合治疗。主要结局指标是1个月时0至10级的平均手臂疼痛结果。组合组的一个月手臂疼痛评分为3.5(95%CI,2.8至4.2),4.2(CI,2.8至4.2)在ESI患者中为4.3(CI为2.8至4.2),在接受保守治疗的患者中为P(0.26)。联合组患者在1个月时平均手臂疼痛平均降低-3.1(95%CI,-3.8至-2.3),而保守组平均降低-1.8(CI,-2.5至-1.2)和-2.0(CI, -2.7至-1.3)在ESI患者中(P = 0.035)。对于颈部疼痛,与联合治疗组相比,联合用药组的平均下降幅度为-2.2(CI,-3.0至-1.5),保守组为-1.2(CI,从-1.9至-0.5),CI为-1.1(CI,-1.8)至-0.4)在收到ESI的人中; P = 0.064)。治疗后三个月,接受联合疗法的患者中有56.9%的结果为阳性,而保守治疗组为26.8%,ESI患者为36.7%(P = 0.006)。结论:对于主要结局指标,两组之间无显着差异。尽管在某些方面,联合疗法比独立疗法具有更好的改善。这些结果表明,针对颈部疼痛的跨学科方法可能会改善预后,但仍需要进行验证性研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号