首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesiology >To BIS or not to BIS
【24h】

To BIS or not to BIS

机译:去还是不去BIS

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To the Editor: I read with interest the study by Mashour et al. The authors are to be congratulated for having performed this large randomized trial to answer an important question regarding the utility of bispectral index monitor and comparing that to minimum alveolar concentration level alarm system. There are few points that warrant clarification. First, the author included patients who received total intravenous anesthesia. However, the details of this subgroup of patients were not provided. The method of determining the minimum alveolar concentration level in the no bispectral index total intravenous anesthesia patients, the alarm limits, and the incidence of awareness in these patients were not described.
机译:致编辑:我感兴趣地阅读了Mashour等人的研究。祝贺作者完成了这项大型随机试验,回答了有关双光谱指数监测仪实用性的重要问题,并将其与最小肺泡浓度水平报警系统进行了比较。有几点需要澄清。首先,作者包括接受全静脉麻醉的患者。但是,未提供该患者亚组的详细信息。没有描述确定无双频谱指数全静脉麻醉患者的最低肺泡浓度水平的方法,警报限值和这些患者的意识发生率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号