...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Infection Control >Assessment of the quality of publicly reported central line-associated bloodstream infection data in Colorado, 2010
【24h】

Assessment of the quality of publicly reported central line-associated bloodstream infection data in Colorado, 2010

机译:2010年在科罗拉多州对公开报告的中心线相关的血液感染数据进行质量评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Validation of self-reported health care-associated infection data is essential to verify correct understanding of definition criteria, surveillance practices, and reporting integrity. Recent studies have found significant under-reporting of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) leading Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment to examine the quality of Colorado's CLABSI data. Methods: Trained Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment staff members performed onsite validation visits that included interviews with infection preventionists to assess surveillance practices and retrospective chart reviews of patients with positive blood cultures in specific intensive care units (adult and neonatal) and long-term acute care hospitals during the first quarter of 2010. Results: Fifty-five CLABSIs from the original sample were identified; 33 (60%) in the adult intensive care unit, 7 (12.7%) in the neonatal intensive care unit, and 15 (27.3%) in the long-term acute care hospital. Of the 55 CLABSIs identified by reviewers, 18 (32.7%) were not reported by the hospitals, 37 CLABSIs (67.3%) were reported correctly into the National Healthcare Safety Network, and 1 CLABSI was over-reported. Conclusions: There was wide variation noted in surveillance practices as well as in application of definition criteria. With 33% under-reported cases, it was concluded that ongoing validation of health care-associated infection data is necessary.
机译:背景:验证自我报告的与卫生保健相关的感染数据对于验证对定义标准,监测实践和报告完整性的正确理解至关重要。最近的研究发现,与中央线相关的血液感染(CLABSI)的报告不足,导致科罗拉多州公共卫生与环境部检查了科罗拉多州CLABSI数据的质量。方法:受过训练的科罗拉多州公共卫生和环境部工作人员进行了现场验证访问,包括与感染预防专家的访谈,以评估监测实践并回顾了特定重症监护病房(成人和新生儿)和长期血培养阳性的患者结果:从原始样本中识别出了55个CLABSI。成人重症监护病房中有33名(60%),新生儿重症监护病房中有7名(12.7%),而长期急诊医院中有15名(27.3%)。在审查者确定的55个CLABSI中,医院未报告18个(32.7%),在国家医疗安全网络中正确报告了37个CLABSI(67.3%),并且有1个CLABSI被过度报告。结论:监测实践以及定义标准的应用存在很大差异。在33%的报告不足的病例中,得出结论,需要持续验证与医疗保健相关的感染数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号