首页> 外文期刊>Anaesthesia: Journal of the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland >Pentax Airway Scope? vs Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in adult patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Pentax Airway Scope? vs Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in adult patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:宾得航空的范围? vs Macintosh喉镜在成人患者气管插管中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Summary The Pentax Airway Scope? is a single-use optical videolaryngoscope designed to assist with difficult tracheal intubation. We systematically reviewed the efficacy of the Pentax Airway Scope with that of a conventional laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in adults with 'normal' and 'difficult' airways. We included 17 randomised controlled trials with a total of 1801 participants. We used the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model to calculate pooled relative risk or weighted mean differences. The relative risk (95% CI) of a Cormack-Lehane grade-1 laryngeal view was 2.40 (1.76-2.49) with the Pentax Airway Scope compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope, p < 0.00001. We found no other differences between the two laryngoscopes. Despite a superior laryngeal view, the Pentax Airway Scope provides little clinical benefit over the conventional laryngoscope.
机译:总结宾得航空公司的航程范围?是一次性使用的光学视频喉镜,旨在协助困难的气管插管。我们系统地回顾了宾得克斯气道镜和传统喉镜对具有“正常”和“困难”气道的成年人气管插管的疗效。我们纳入了17项随机对照试验,共有1801名参与者。我们使用DerSimonian和Laird随机效应模型来计算合并的相对风险或加权均数差。与Macintosh喉镜相比,Pentax Airway Scope的Cormack-Lehane 1级喉镜的相对风险(95%CI)为2.40(1.76-2.49)。我们发现两个喉镜之间没有其他区别。尽管具有优越的喉镜视野,但宾得气道镜较传统喉镜几乎没有临床益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号