比较光棒、Shikani喉镜及Macintosh喉镜引导气管插管在临床中的应用

摘要

Objective To compare of the application of tracheal intubation guided by Lightwand,Shikani optical stylet,or Macintosh. Methods Ninety ASA Ⅰ~Ⅱ patients undergoing elective general anesthesia were randomly divided into three groups(n = 30):Macintosh group(group M),Lightwand group(group L)and Shi-kani optical stylet group(group S). MAP and HR were recorded at the time of entering the operating room(T1), before intubation(T2),at the immediate time of intubation(T3),3 mins(T4)and 5 mins after intubation(T5). The intubation duration,the first intubation success rate,the number of intubation,and the incidence of complications including sore throat were observed. Results As compared with T1,MAP and HR decreased significantly at T2in the three groups(P<0.05). As compared with T2,HR increased in group L and MAP and HR increased in group S at T3(P<0.05). As compared with group M,MAP and HR at T4and T5were lower in groups L and S(P<0.05). The first intubation time was obviously shorter in group L than in other groups(P<0.05). The incidence of compli-cations was lower in group S(P < 0.05). The first success rate of intubation,the intubation times and the inci-dence of airway complications did not differ significantly among the three groups.(P > 0.05). Conclusions As compared with Macintosh,Lightwand and Shikani optical stylet have less influence on hemodynamic parameters. Lightwand needs shorter intubation time,Shikani optical stylet has the lowest rate of sore throat.%目的 比较光棒、Shikani喉镜及Macintosh喉镜引导气管插管在临床的应用效果.方法 选择90例ASAⅠ-Ⅱ级全麻择期手术患者,随机均分为Macintosh喉镜组(M组)、光棒组(L组)和Shikani喉镜组(S组),每组30例.观测入室后(T1)、诱导后插管前(T2)、插管后即刻(T3)、插管后3 min(T4)、5 min(T5)的平均动脉压(MAP)和心率(HR)的情况,记录完成插管时间、插管次数、1次插管成功率、咽喉疼痛及相关并发症发生情况.结果 与T1比较,三组T2时MAP和HR明显降低(P<0.05);与T2比较,T3时L组HR升高,S组MAP和HR升高(P<0.05);与M组比较,L组和S组T4和T5时MAP和HR降低(P<0.05).L组1次气管插管完成时间明显短于S组及M组(P<0.05),咽喉疼痛发生率S组低于L组和M组(P<0.05),三组的首插管成功率、插管次数等差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 在一般患者气管插管中,光棒和Shikani喉镜在插管时对血流动力学影响较Macintosh喉镜小,光棒插管完成时间最短,而Shikani喉镜咽喉疼痛发生率最低.