...
首页> 外文期刊>Anaesthesia and intensive care >Experience with high frequency oscillation ventilation during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic in Australia and New Zealand.
【24h】

Experience with high frequency oscillation ventilation during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic in Australia and New Zealand.

机译:澳大利亚和新西兰在2009年H1N1流感大流行中使用高频振荡通气的经验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

During the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, large numbers of patients had severe respiratory failure. High frequency oscillation ventilation was used as a salvage technique for profound hypoxaemia. Our aim was to compare this experience with high frequency oscillation ventilation during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic with the same period in 2008 by performing a three-month period prevalence study in Australian and New Zealand intensive care units. The main study end-points were clinical demographics, care delivery and survival. Nine intensive care units contributed data. During 2009 there were 22 H1N1 patients (17 adults, five children) and 10 non-H1N1 patients (five adults, five children), while in 2008, 18 patients (two adults, 16 children) received high frequency oscillation ventilation. The principal non-H1N1 high frequency oscillation ventilation indication was bacterial or viral pneumonia (56%). For H1N1 patients, the median duration of high frequency oscillation ventilation was 3.7 days (interquartile range 1.8 to 5) with concomitant therapies including recruitment manoeuvres (22%), prone ventilation (41%), inhaled prostacyclins (18%) and inhaled nitric oxide (36%). Seven patients received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, six having H1N1. Three patients had extracorporeal membrane oxygenation concurrently, two as salvage therapy following the commencement of high frequency oscillation ventilation. In 2008, no high frequency oscillation ventilation patient received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Overall hospital survival was 77% in H1N1 patients, while survival in patients having adjunctive extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was similar to those receiving high frequency oscillation ventilation alone (65% compared to 71%, P = 1.00). Survival rates were comparable to published extracorporeal membrane oxygenation outcomes. High frequency oscillation ventilation was used successfully as a rescue therapy for severe respiratory failure. High frequency oscillation ventilation was only available in a limited number of intensive care units during the H1N1 pandemic.
机译:在2009年H1N1大流行期间,大量患者出现严重的呼吸衰竭。高频振荡通气被用作严重低氧血症的抢救技术。我们的目的是通过在澳大利亚和新西兰的重症监护病房进行为期三个月的患病率研究,将这种经历与2009年H1N1大流行期间和2008年同期的高频振荡通气进行比较。研究的主要终点是临床人口统计学,护理提供和生存率。九个重症监护室提供了数据。 2009年期间,有22名H1N1患者(17名成人,5名儿童)和10名非H1N1患者(5名成人,5名儿童),而2008年,有18名患者(两名成人,16名儿童)接受了高频振荡通气。非H1N1高频振荡通气的主要指征是细菌性或病毒性肺炎(56%)。对于H1N1患者,高频振荡通气的中位时间为3.7天(四分位间距为1.8至5),并伴有包括招募动作(22%),俯卧通气(41%),吸入前列环素(18%)和一氧化氮的伴随疗法(36%)。七名患者接受了体外膜氧合,其中六名患有H1N1。 3例患者同时进行了体外膜氧合,其中2例作为高频振荡通气开始后的抢救疗法。 2008年,没有高频振荡通气患者接受体外膜氧合。 H1N1患者的整体医院生存率为77%,而体外膜辅助性氧合患者的生存率与仅接受高频振荡通气的患者相似(65%对71%,P = 1.00)。存活率与已公布的体外膜氧合结果相当。高频振荡通气已成功用于严重呼吸衰竭的抢救治疗。在H1N1大流行期间,高频振荡通气仅在有限数量的重症监护病房中可用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号