首页> 外文期刊>Birth >Obstetric Interventions for Low-Risk Pregnant Women in France: Do Maternity Unit Characteristics Make a Difference?
【24h】

Obstetric Interventions for Low-Risk Pregnant Women in France: Do Maternity Unit Characteristics Make a Difference?

机译:法国低危孕妇的产科干预:产妇特征是否有所不同?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: In many countries the closure of small maternity units has raised concerns about how the concentration of low-risk pregnancies in large specialized units might affect the management of childbirth. We aimed to assess the role of maternity unit characteristics on obstetric intervention rates among low-risk women in France. Methods: Data on low-risk deliveries came from the 2010 French National Perinatal Survey of a representative sample of births (n = 9,530). The maternity unit characteristics studied were size, level of care, and private or public status; the interventions included induction of labor; cesarean section; operative vaginal delivery (forceps, spatulas or vacuum); and episiotomy. Multilevel logistic regression analyses were adjusted for maternal confounding factors, gestational age, and infant birthweight. Results: The rates of induction, cesarean section, operative delivery, and episiotomy in this low-risk population were 23.9 percent, 10.1 percent, 15.2 percent, and 19.6 percent, respectively, and 52.0 percent of deliveries included at least one of them. Unit size was unrelated to any intervention except operative delivery (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.47 (95% CI, 1.10-1.96) for units with >3,000 deliveries per year vs units with <1,000). The rate of every intervention was higher in private units, and the aOR for any intervention was 1.82 (95% CI, 1.59-2.08). After adjustment for maternal characteristics and facility size and status, significant variations in the use of interventions remained between units, especially for episiotomies. Results for level of care were similar to those for unit size. Conclusions: The concentration of births in large maternity units in France is not associated with higher rates of interventions for low-risk births. The situation in private units could be explained by differences in the organization of care. Additional research should explore the differences in practices between maternity units with similar characteristics.
机译:背景:在许多国家,小型产科的关闭引起了人们的关注,即低风险怀孕集中在大型专业病房中会如何影响分娩的管理。我们旨在评估法国低风险妇女的产妇特征对产科干预率的影响。方法:关于低风险分娩的数据来自2010年法国全国围产期调查,该调查有代表性的出生样本(n = 9,530)。研究的产妇单位特征是规模,照护水平以及私人或公共地位;干预措施包括引产;剖宫产;手术阴道分娩(镊子,刮刀或真空);和会阴切开术。对母亲的混杂因素,胎龄和婴儿出生体重进行了多级逻辑回归分析。结果:在该低危人群中,引产,剖宫产,手术分娩和会阴切开术的发生率分别为23.9%,10.1%,15.2%和19.6%,其中52.0%的分娩包括其中至少一种。除手术分娩外,单位大小与任何干预措施均无关(每年分娩> 3,000的单位与<1,000的单位相比,校正后的优势比[aOR] = 1.47(95%CI,1.10-1.96)。私人单位的每次干预率较高,任何干预的aOR为1.82(95%CI,1.59-2.08)。在调整了孕产妇的特征以及设施的大小和状况之后,各单位之间的干预措施仍然存在很大差异,尤其是对于癫痫切除术。护理水平的结果与单位大小的结果相似。结论:法国大型产妇出生集中与低风险出生干预率较高无关。私人部门的情况可以通过护理组织的差异来解释。进一步的研究应探讨具有相似特征的产妇单位之间在实践上的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号