首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth >Are freestanding midwifery units a safe alternative to obstetric units for low-risk primiparous childbirth? An analysis of effect differences by parity in a matched cohort study
【2h】

Are freestanding midwifery units a safe alternative to obstetric units for low-risk primiparous childbirth? An analysis of effect differences by parity in a matched cohort study

机译:对于低危初产的妇女独立的助产单位是否可以安全替代产科?在配对队列研究中按均等进行效果差异分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundIntrapartum complications and the use of obstetric interventions are more common in primiparous childbirth than in multiparous childbirth, leading to concern about out of hospital birth for primiparous women. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the effect of birthplace on perinatal and maternal morbidity and the use of obstetric interventions differed by parity among low-risk women intending to give birth in a freestanding midwifery unit or in an obstetric unit in the North Denmark Region.
机译:背景技术产妇并发症和产科干预措施在初产妇中比在多产妇中更为常见,这引起了对初产妇出院的担忧。这项研究的目的是确定出生地点对围产期和产妇发病率的影响以及使用产科干预措施是否因在北丹麦打算在独立助产科或产科分娩的低危妇女中的均等性而有所不同。区域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号