首页> 外文学位 >Using grounded theory to discover the differences between learning communities and freestanding classes.
【24h】

Using grounded theory to discover the differences between learning communities and freestanding classes.

机译:使用扎根理论发现学习社区和独立班级之间的差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Despite the fact that no specific teaching methods can be singled out for teaching all college students, there is a growing awareness of the need for facilitating supportive relationships and for making interdisciplinary connections in the classroom as a means of increasing academic achievement and retention on college campuses. The principal objective of the present study is to discover what distinguishes learning communities (i.e., two or three linked classes with collaborative and interdisciplinary themes) from freestanding classes.; Qualitative research methods were used in the present study to provide a thorough analysis of learning communities using ethnographic methodologies (e.g., class observations and videotaping, student interviews, surveys, academic histories) that reflect the day-to-day realities of college learning, both in freestanding classes and learning communities. The main purposes of the research were twofold: First, to establish that the instruction and social interaction in learning communities did differ from freestanding classes. Second, to provide a detailed description of these differences. Both freestanding and learning community classes were taught by the same instructors and were almost identical in terms of class activities, assignments and student evaluation. Based on observations across three semesters and between four learning communities and freestanding classes, the following categorical dimensions were found to distinguish learning communities from freestanding classes: (a) fluidity of interpersonal connections among students and between students and faculty, (b) level of active participation, (c) enthusiasm and liveliness in the classroom, (d) effectiveness of collaboration among students to complete a task, (e) quick voicing of concerns and questions, (f) regularity of attendance and use of support services, (g) number of failures, (h) student perception of curricular connections, and (i) effectiveness of faculty-student interventions. In summary students in learning communities: (1) were more likely to attend class, (2) were less likely to fail or withdraw, (3) studied more with each other, (4) socialized more with each other, and (5) were more lively in the classroom. These data provide support for differences between learning communities and freestanding classes and further support for the benefits of linking college classes to create more connections across the curriculum.
机译:尽管没有一种特殊的教学方法可以选出适合所有大学生的教学方法,但人们越来越意识到需要促进相互支持的关系并在课堂上建立跨学科的联系,以此来提高学业成绩和留住大学校园。本研究的主要目的是发现区别于独立社区的学习社区(即,具有协作和跨学科主题的两个或三个链接的教室)的区别。定性研究方法用于本研究中,以使用民族志方法论(例如,课堂观察和录像,学生访谈,调查,学术历史)对学习社区进行全面分析,这反映了大学学习的日常现实,两者在独立的班级和学习社区中。该研究的主要目的是双重的:首先,要确定学习社区中的教学和社交互动确实不同于独立班级。其次,提供这些差异的详细描述。独立式和学习型社区班均由同一位讲师讲授,并且在课堂活动,作业和学生评价方面几乎相同。根据三个学期以及四个学习社区和独立班级之间的观察,发现以下分类维度将学习社区与独立班级区分开:(a)学生之间以及学生与教职员工之间人际关系的流动性,(b)活跃水平参与,(c)课堂上的热情和活泼,(d)学生之间完成一项任务的协作的有效性,(e)对问题和疑虑的快速表达,(f)出席和使用支持服务的规律性,(g)失败的次数,(h)学生对课程联系的理解,以及(i)师生干预的有效性。总之,学习社区中的学生:(1)更有可能上课,(2)失败或退学的可能性较小,(3)彼此学习更多,(4)彼此进行更多的社交,以及(5)在教室里更加活跃。这些数据为学习社区与独立班级之间的差异提供了支持,并为链接大学班级以在整个课程中建立更多联系提供了更多支持。

著录项

  • 作者

    Coulter-Kern, Marcie Lola.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Notre Dame.;

  • 授予单位 University of Notre Dame.;
  • 学科 Education Educational Psychology.; Education Curriculum and Instruction.; Education Higher.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 163 p.
  • 总页数 163
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教育心理学;教育;高等教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号