首页> 外文期刊>American journal of public health >Social impact analysis of the effects of a telemedicine intervention to improve diabetes outcomes in an ethnically diverse, medically underserved population: Findings from the IDEATel study
【24h】

Social impact analysis of the effects of a telemedicine intervention to improve diabetes outcomes in an ethnically diverse, medically underserved population: Findings from the IDEATel study

机译:远程医疗干预对改善种族多样性,医疗服务不足人群的糖尿病结局的影响的社会影响分析:IDEATel研究的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives. We examined the social impact of the telemedicine intervention effects in lower- and higher-socioeconomic status (SES) participants in the Informatics for Diabetes Education and Telemedicine (IDEATel) study. Methods. We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing telemedicine case management with usual care, with blinded outcome evaluation, in 1665 Medicare recipients with diabetes, aged 55 years or older, residing in federally designated medically underserved areas of New York State. The primary trial endpoints were hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and systolic blood pressure levels. Results. HbA1c was higher in lower-income participants at the baseline examination. However, we found no evidence that the intervention increased disparities. A significant moderator effect was seen for HbA1c (P = .004) and systolic blood pressure (P = .023), with the lowest-income group showing greater intervention effects. Conclusions. Lower-SES participants in the IDEATel study benefited at least as much as higher-SES participants from telemedicine nurse case management for diabetes. Tailoring the intensity of the intervention based on clinical need may have led to greater improvements among those not at goal for diabetes control, a group that also had lower income, thereby avoiding the potential for an innovative intervention to widen socioeconomic disparities.
机译:目标。在糖尿病教育和远程医疗信息学(IDEATel)研究中,我们研究了远程医疗干预对低社会经济地位和高社会经济地位(SES)参与者的社会影响。方法。我们进行了一项随机对照试验,对居住在纽约州联邦指定医疗不足地区的1665名55岁或以上的Medicare糖尿病患者进行了比较,对远程医疗病例管理与常规护理进行了盲目结局评估。主要试验终点为血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c),低密度脂蛋白胆固醇和收缩压水平。结果。在基线检查时,低收入参与者的HbA1c较高。但是,我们没有发现干预措施加剧差距的证据。观察到HbA1c(P = .004)和收缩压(P = .023)的显着调节作用,而最低收入组表现出更大的干预作用。结论IDEATel研究中低SES参与者从远程医疗护士糖尿病病例管理中受益至少与高SES参与者一样多。根据临床需要量身定制干预措施的强度可能会导致那些并非针对糖尿病的目标人群(那些收入较低的人群)取得更大的进步,从而避免了采取创新干预措施扩大社会经济差异的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号