首页> 外文期刊>American journal of therapeutics >Myths in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: An Alternative Viewpoint Based on Randomized Controlled Trials
【24h】

Myths in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: An Alternative Viewpoint Based on Randomized Controlled Trials

机译:治疗2型糖尿病的神话:基于随机对照试验的替代观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Numerous randomized control trials (RCTs) have now questioned the effectiveness and safety of several therapeutic interventions in type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Those RCTs that address several therapeutic interventions in T2DM were reviewed. Meta-analysis and ad hoc analysis were excluded. The data from those trials involving self-monitoring of blood glucose, treating hyperglycemia, lowering triglycerides, aggressive treatment of hypertension, and antiplatelet therapy with aspirin are presented with emphasis on hard end points. The evidence shows that self-monitoring of blood glucose, lowering blood glucose, reducing triglycerides, aggressive treatment of hypertension, and aspirin therapy are of questionable value in T2DM and may cause harm. Based on RCTs, most therapies in the treatment of T2DM are of questionable value. The medical community should reassess the usefulness of these therapies, which have become commonplace in the management of this condition.
机译:现在,许多随机对照试验(RCT)对2型糖尿病(T2DM)的几种治疗性干预的有效性和安全性提出了质疑。那些针对T2DM中几种治疗性干预措施的RCT进行了综述。荟萃分析和临时分析被排除在外。这些试验的数据涉及血糖自我监测,治疗高血糖症,降低甘油三酸酯,积极治疗高血压和使用阿司匹林进行抗血小板治疗,重点是硬性终点。证据表明,血糖自我监测,降低血糖,减少甘油三酸酯,积极治疗高血压和阿司匹林疗法在T2DM中具有可疑的价值,并可能造成伤害。基于RCT,大多数治疗T2DM的方法具有可疑的价值。医学界应重新评估这些疗法的有效性,这些疗法已在这种疾病的治疗中变得司空见惯。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号