首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Kidney Diseases: The official journal of the National Kidney Foundation >Phosphate removal with several thrice-weekly dialysis methods in overweight hemodialysis patients.
【24h】

Phosphate removal with several thrice-weekly dialysis methods in overweight hemodialysis patients.

机译:超重血液透析患者采用每周三次的几种透析方法去除磷酸盐。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Currently available phosphate binders are associated with either hypercalcemia or high costs, which limit their use in hemodialysis patients. Whether modifying dialysis prescription to intensify small-solute clearance also leads to better phosphate clearance is unknown. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized crossover trial. PARTICIPANTS: Large patients (>80 kg; N = 18) who could not achieve adequate Kt/V during a standard 4-hour thrice-weekly prescription of maintenance hemodialysis. INTERVENTION: 2 high-flux dialyzers in parallel for 4 hours in comparison to 3 other dialysis modalities (4 hours of standard hemodialysis, 4.5 hours of hemodialysis, and 4 hours of hemodialysis with increased dialysate flow). OUTCOMES: (1) Predialysis serum phosphate level, (2) postdialysis phosphate level, (3) phosphate clearance, and (4) phosphate removal, all assessed during the last midweek session for each of the 4 different modalities. RESULTS: Mean baseline predialysis serum phosphate level was 5.95 +/- 1.95 mg/dL. Using 2 dialyzers in parallel was associated with a significant decrease in predialysis serum phosphate level compared with standard hemodialysis (1.33 mg/dL lower; P = 0.01). Mean serum postdialysis serum phosphate levels during the last treatment of the double-dialyzer period were also lower by 0.43 and 0.74 mg/dL than during the last treatment of the standard-hemodialysis (P = 0.05) and increased-dialysate-flow (P < 0.001) periods, respectively. The double-dialyzer strategy also was associated with greater phosphate clearance (113.4 mL/min; 95% confidence interval [CI], 101.4 to 125.3) than the other 3 strategies (83.9 mL/min; 95% CI, 71.6 to 96.2; 86.6 mL/min; 95% CI, 73.8 to 99.3; and 83.0 mL/min; 95% CI, 71.1 to 94.9), but not greater phosphate removal. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size, short study duration, and results of phosphate removal analysis inconclusive. CONCLUSION: Use of 2 dialyzers in parallel for 6 weeks in overweight hemodialysis patients led to substantially lower predialysis phosphate levels. Future studies should explore the potential contribution of increased dialyzer surface area to better control of serum phosphate levels in maintenance hemodialysis patients.
机译:背景:目前可用的磷酸盐粘合剂与高钙血症或高成本有关,这限制了它们在血液透析患者中​​的使用。修改透析处方以增强小溶质清除率是否还会导致更好的磷酸盐清除率尚不清楚。研究设计:随机交叉试验。参与者:大型患者(> 80 kg; N = 18),他们在维持血液透析的标准每周4小时三次的处方中未能达到适当的Kt / V。干预:与其他3种透析方式(4个小时的标准血液透析,4.5个小时的血液透析和4个小时的血液透析,透析液流量增加)相比,2台高通量透析器并行进行4个小时。结果:(1)透析前血清磷酸盐水平,(2)透析后磷酸盐水平,(3)磷酸盐清除率和(4)磷酸盐去除,所有结果均在最后一个星期中时段对4种不同方式进行了评估。结果:透析前平均基线血清磷酸盐水平为5.95 +/- 1.95 mg / dL。与标准血液透析相比,平行使用2台透析器与透析前血清磷酸盐水平显着降低有关(降低1.33 mg / dL; P = 0.01)。在两次透析的最后一次治疗期间,平均透析后的血清磷酸盐水平也比标准血液透析的最后一次治疗(P = 0.05)和透析液流量增加(P <0.05)低了0.43和0.74 mg / dL。 0.001)期。与其他3种策略(83.9 mL / min; 95%CI,71.6至96.2; 86.6)相比,双透析器策略还具有更大的磷酸盐清除率(113.4 mL / min; 95%置信区间[CI],101.4至125.3) mL / min; 95%CI,73.8至99.3;和83.0 mL / min; 95%CI,71.1至94.9),但磷酸盐去除率不更高。局限性:样本量小,研究持续时间短以及磷酸盐去除分析的结果尚无定论。结论:超重血液透析患者并行使用2台透析器连续6周,导致透析前磷酸盐水平大大降低。未来的研究应探讨增加透析器表面积对更好地控制维持性血液透析患者血清磷酸盐水平的潜在作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号