首页> 外文期刊>ACS applied materials & interfaces >Contrasting Performance of Donor-Acceptor Copolymer Pairs in Ternary Blend Solar Cells and Two-Acceptor Copolymers in Binary Blend Solar Cells
【24h】

Contrasting Performance of Donor-Acceptor Copolymer Pairs in Ternary Blend Solar Cells and Two-Acceptor Copolymers in Binary Blend Solar Cells

机译:三元共混太阳能电池中供体-受体共聚物对的性能与二元共混太阳能电池中两种受体的对比性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Here two contrasting approaches to polymerfullerene solar cells are compared. In the first approach, two distinct semi-random donoracceptor copolymers are blended with phenyl-C-61-butyric acid methyl ester (PC61BM) to form ternary blend solar cells. The two poly(3-hexylthiophene)-based polymers contain either the acceptor thienopyrroledione (TPD) or diketopyrrolopyrrole (DPP). In the second approach, semi-random donoracceptor copolymers containing both TPD and DPP acceptors in the same polymer backbone, termed two-acceptor polymers, are blended with PC61BM to give binary blend solar cells. The two approaches result in bulk heterojunction solar cells that have the same molecular active-layer components but differ in the manner in which these molecular components are mixed, either by physical mixing (ternary blend) or chemical mixing in the two-acceptor (binary blend) case. Optical properties and photon-to-electron conversion efficiencies of the binary and ternary blends were found to have similar features and were described as a linear combination of the individual components. At the same time, significant differences were observed in the open-circuit voltage (V-oc) behaviors of binary and ternary blend solar cells. While in case of two-acceptor polymers, the V-oc was found to be in the range of 0.495-0.552 V, ternary blend solar cells showed behavior inherent to organic alloy formation, displaying an intermediate, composition-dependent and tunable Voc in the range from 0.582 to 0.684 V, significantly exceeding the values achieved in the two-acceptor containing binary blend solar cells. Despite the differences between the physical and chemical mixing approaches, both pathways provided solar cells with similar power conversion efficiencies, highlighting the advantages of both pathways toward highly efficient organic solar cells.
机译:在此,对聚合物富勒烯太阳能电池的两种对比方法进行了比较。在第一种方法中,将两种不同的半随机供体受体共聚物与苯基-C-61-丁酸甲酯(PC61BM)混合形成三元共混太阳能电池。两种基于聚(3-己基噻吩)的聚合物包含受体噻吩并吡咯酮(TPD)或二酮吡咯并吡咯(DPP)。在第二种方法中,将在同一聚合物主链中同时包含TPD和DPP受体的半随机给体/受体共聚物与PC61BM混合,得到二元共混太阳能电池。两种方法导致整体异质结太阳能电池具有相同的分子活性层成分,但在物理上混合(三元共混)或在两受体中进行化学混合(二元共混),这些分子成分的混合方式不同) 案件。发现二元和三元共混物的光学性质和光子-电子转换效率具有相似的特征,并被描述为单个组分的线性组合。同时,在二元和三元混合太阳能电池的开路电压(V-oc)行为中观察到显着差异。在使用两受体聚合物的情况下,V-oc的范围为0.495-0.552 V,而三元共混太阳能电池则表现出有机合金形成所固有的行为,在电池中显示出中等的,成分依赖性的和可调的Voc。电压范围为0.582至0.684 V,大大超过了包含两个接受器的二元混合太阳能电池所达到的值。尽管物理和化学混合方法之间存在差异,但这两种途径都为太阳能电池提供了相似的功率转换效率,突出了这两种途径在实现高效有机太阳能电池方面的优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号