...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of psychiatry >Oxcarbazepine and Pediatric Bipolar Disorder
【24h】

Oxcarbazepine and Pediatric Bipolar Disorder

机译:奥卡西平与小儿双相情感障碍

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

To the Editor: In reference to the article by Karen Dineen Wagner, M.D., Ph.D., et al. (1), two issues need clarification re- garding 1) generalizability of the study results and 2) issues of comorbidity and combination therapy. First, in Table 1, the authors reported that the mean number of manic/hypomanic episodes ranged between 15.1-17.1 in the past year of the illness in the groups randomly assigned to oxcarbazepine and placebo, respectively. This seems to be in significant variance with the cohort recruited for the basic descriptive psychopathology study by Geller et al. (2), where, using arguably the best available state-of-the-art diagnostic methods and operationalized definitions of episodes and "cycling," the index episode of mania at intake had a mean duration of 3.5 years, and there were no subjects characterized as "rapid cyclers" (four or more mood episodes per year), but the vast majority of subjects had ultrarapid cycling or ultradian cycling within a single prolonged episode. The average age of the study subjects is not dissimilar, and the male predominance in the two studies is quite similar. Are we left to conclude that the study subjects are in fact composed of different phenotypes of mania or bipolar disorder? Or is there a difference in the way terms such as "episodes" or "cycles" are being used, reflecting disagreement between research groups? Do the authors have suggestions regarding terminology so that interested readers can make informed comparisons between studies regarding the description of basic research subject characteristics?
机译:致编辑:参考医学博士Karen Dineen Wagner的文章,等。 (1)关于两个问题需要澄清:1)研究结果的概括性; 2)合并症和联合治疗。首先,在表1中,作者报告说,在随机分配奥卡西平和安慰剂的组中,疾病的过去一年中,躁狂/低躁狂发作的平均次数介于15.1-17.1之间。这似乎与Geller等人为基本描述性精神病理学研究招募的队列有很大差异。 (2),在使用可以说是最好的,最先进的诊断方法以及发作和“骑车”的可操作定义的情况下,摄入时躁狂的指数发作平均持续时间为3.5年,没有受试者特征为“快速骑自行车者”(每年发生4次或更多情绪发作),但绝大多数受试者在单次长时间发作内都进行了超快速骑行或超人骑行。研究对象的平均年龄没有差异,并且两项研究中的男性优势非常相似。我们是否可以得出结论,研究对象实际上是由躁狂症或躁郁症的不同表型组成?还是使用诸如“情节”或“周期”之类的术语的方式有所不同,反映了研究组之间的分歧?作者对术语有什么建议,以便感兴趣的读者可以就基础研究主题特征的描述在研究之间进行明智的比较吗?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号