...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of clinical psychiatry >Further evidence for robust familiality of pediatric bipolar I disorder: Results from a very large controlled family study of pediatric bipolar I disorder and a meta-analysis
【24h】

Further evidence for robust familiality of pediatric bipolar I disorder: Results from a very large controlled family study of pediatric bipolar I disorder and a meta-analysis

机译:小儿双相I障碍健壮家族性的进一步证据:小儿双相I障碍的大型对照家庭研究结果和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To determine the risk for bipolar I disorder in first-degree relatives of children with DSM-IV bipolar I disorder via meta-analysis and expanded controlled study. Data Sources and Extraction: For the meta-analysis, was searched for scientific articles published in the world literature in English through 2011. The keywords searched were bipolar disorder, first-degree relatives, family study, and control. All online abstracts were reviewed, and relevant full manuscripts were collected and reviewed. Citations were also examined for other potentially relevant articles. The analysis included only controlled family studies that examined rates of bipolar I disorder in all first-degree relatives (parents and siblings) of pediatric bipolar I probands and that had age- and sex-matched controls. Family history studies were excluded, as were studies that were not in English, did not report bipolar I rates for all first-degree relatives, or reported only bipolar spectrum rates. Also excluded were family studies that included only adult probands. A meta-analysis was conducted of the 5 controlled family studies of pediatric bipolar I probands that met the search criteria using the random-effects model of DerSimonian and Laird. Method: For the family study, our previous sample of DSM-IV bipolar I probands was greatly expanded using structured diagnostic interviews. The new study included 239 children aged 6-17 years who satisfied full DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for bipolar I disorder (n = 726 first-degree relatives), 162 attentiondeficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) probands (without bipolar I disorder; n = 511 first-degree relatives), and 136 healthy control probands (without ADHD or bipolar I disorder; n = 411 first-degree relatives). The Kaplan-Meier cumulative failure function was used to calculate survival curves and cumulative lifetime risk in relatives. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate the risk of bipolar I disorder in relatives. Results: The pooled odds ratio for bipolar I disorder in relatives was estimated to be 6.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8-10.1). First-degree relatives of bipolar I probands were also significantly more likely than first-degree relatives of both ADHD probands (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.02; 95% CI, 1.85-4.93; P <.001) and control probands (HR = 2.83; 95% CI, 1.65-4.84; P <.001) to have bipolar I disorder. Conclusions: Our results document an increased familial risk for bipolar I disorder in relatives of pediatric probands with DSM-IV bipolar I disorder.
机译:目的:通过荟萃分析和扩大的对照研究,确定DSM-IV双相I障碍儿童一级亲属患双相I障碍的风险。数据来源和提取:为了进行荟萃分析,搜索了直到2011年以英语发表在世界文学上的科学文章。搜索的关键词为躁郁症,一级亲属,家庭研究和对照。审查了所有在线摘要,并收集和审查了相关的完整手稿。还检查了其他潜在相关文章的引用。该分析仅包括对照家庭研究,该研究检查了儿童双相I先证者的所有一级亲属(父母和兄弟姐妹)中双相I障碍的发生率,并进行了年龄和性别匹配的对照。家族史研究被排除在外,非英语的研究,未报告所有一级亲属的双相I率或仅报告了双相谱率的研究也被排除在外。还排除了仅包括成年先证者的家庭研究。使用DerSimonian和Laird的随机效应模型对符合检索标准的5个小儿双相I先证者进行了家庭对照研究的荟萃分析。方法:对于家庭研究,我们先前的DSM-IV双极I先证者样本通过结构化诊断访谈得到了极大扩展。这项新研究包括239位6-17岁儿童,他们完全符合双相I障碍的DSM-IV诊断标准(n = 726一级亲属),162名注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)先证者(无双相I障碍; n = 511个一级亲属)和136个健康对照先证者(无ADHD或双相I障碍; n = 411个一级亲属)。 Kaplan-Meier累积失败函数用于计算亲属的生存曲线和累积终生风险。使用Cox比例风险模型来计算亲属双相I障碍的风险。结果:亲戚中双相I型障碍的合并优势比估计为6.96(95%置信区间[CI],4.8-10.1)。双极I先证者的一级亲属也比ADHD先证者的一级亲属(危险比[HR] = 3.02; 95%CI,1.85-4.93; P <.001)和对照先证者(HR = 2.83; 95%CI,1.65-4.84; P <.001)患有双相性I型障碍。结论:我们的结果证明,患有DSM-IV双相I型障碍的小儿先证者的亲属患双相I型障碍的家族性风险增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号