...
首页> 外文期刊>Primary care companion to the journal of clinical psychiatry >Further Evidence for Robust Familiality of Pediatric Bipolar I Disorder: Results From a Very Large Controlled Family Study of Pediatric Bipolar I Disorder and a Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Further Evidence for Robust Familiality of Pediatric Bipolar I Disorder: Results From a Very Large Controlled Family Study of Pediatric Bipolar I Disorder and a Meta-Analysis

机译:小儿双相I障碍健壮家族性的进一步证据:小儿双相I障碍的非常大的对照家庭研究结果和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: To determine the risk for bipolar I disorder in first-degree relatives of children with DSM-IV bipolar I disorder via meta-analysis and expanded controlled study. Data Sources and Extraction: Meta-Analysis. We searched the PubMed database for scientific articles published in the world literature in the English language through 2011. The keywords searched were bipolar disorder, first-degree relatives, family study, control. All online abstracts were reviewed and relevant full manuscripts were collected and reviewed. Citations were also examined for other potential relevant articles. We included only controlled family studies that examined rates of bipolar I disorder in all first-degree relatives (parents and siblings) of pediatric bipolar I probands and included only studies that had age- and sex-matched controls. Family history studies were excluded. Also excluded were studies that were not in English, did not report the rates of all first-degree relatives, and reported only bipolar spectrum rates. We also excluded family studies that included only adult probands. We conducted a meta-analysis of the 5 controlled family studies of pediatric bipolar I probands that met our search criteria using the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird. Method: Family Study. We greatly expanded our previous sample of DSM-IV bipolar I probands using structured diagnostic interviews. Our new study included 239 children satisfying full DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for bipolar I disorder (n = 687 first-degree relatives), 162 ADHD (without bipolar I disorder) probands (n = 511 first-degree relatives), and 136 healthy control (without ADHD or bipolar I disorder) probands (n = 411 first-degree relatives). We used the Kaplan-Meier cumulative failure function to calculate survival curves and cumulative, lifetime risk in relatives. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate the risk of bipolar I disorder in relatives. Results: The pooled odds ratio for bipolar I disorder in relatives was estimated to be 6.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8 to 10.1). We also found first-degree relatives of bipolar I probands to be significantly more likely than first-degree relatives of both ADHD (hazards ratio [HR] = 2.73; 95% CI, 1.66 to 4.50; P < .001) and control probands (HR = 2.71; 1.57 to 4.66; P < .001) to have bipolar I disorder. Conclusions: Our results document an increased familial risk for bipolar I disorder in relatives of pediatric probands with DSM-IV bipolar I disorder.
机译:目的:通过荟萃分析和扩展的对照研究,确定DSM-IV双相性I障碍儿童一级亲属患双相性I障碍的风险。数据来源和提取:荟萃分析。我们在PubMed数据库中搜索了直到2011年以英语在世界文学中发表过的科学文章。搜索的关键词是躁郁症,一级亲属,家庭学习,对照。审查了所有在线摘要,并收集和审查了相关的完整手稿。还检查了其他潜在相关文章的引文。我们仅包括对照家庭研究,该研究检查了小儿双相I先证者的所有一级亲属(父母和兄弟姐妹)的双相I障碍的发生率,并且仅包括年龄和性别相匹配的对照的研究。家族史研究被排除在外。还排除了非英语,未报告所有一级亲属比率,仅报告双极谱比率的研究。我们还排除了仅包括成年先证者的家庭研究。我们使用DerSimonian和Laird的随机效应模型对符合我们搜索标准的5个小儿双相I先证者的受控家族研究进行了荟萃分析。方法:家庭学习。我们使用结构化诊断访谈极大地扩展了我们先前的DSM-IV双极I先证者样本。我们的新研究包括239名满足DSM-IV诊断标准的儿童(双相I型障碍,n 687名一级亲属),162名ADHD(无双相I型障碍)先证者(n = 511名一级亲属)和136名健康对照者(无ADHD或双相I型障碍)先证者(n = 411个一级亲属)。我们使用Kaplan-Meier累积失效函数来计算生存曲线和亲戚的累积终生风险。使用Cox比例风险模型来计算亲属中双相I障碍的风险。结果:亲戚中双相I型障碍的合并优势比估计为6.96(95%置信区间[CI]为4.8至10.1)。我们还发现,双相I先证者的一级亲属比ADHD(危险比[HR] = 2.73; 95%CI,1.66至4.50; P <.001)和一级先证者的一级亲属的可能性要大得多。 HR = 2.71; 1.57至4.66; P <.001)患有双相性I型障碍。结论:我们的结果表明,患有DSM-IV双相I型障碍的小儿先证者的亲属患双相I型障碍的家族性风险增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号