Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial

Maenpaa Minna M.; Nieminen Kari; Tomas Eija I.; Laurila Marita; Luukkaala Tiina H.; Maenpaa Johanna U.

首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology >Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial

【24h】

Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial

机译：机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜手术治疗子宫内膜癌：一项随机对照试验

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

BACKGROUND: Previous studies comparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery to traditional laparoscopic or open surgery in gynecologic oncology have been retrospective. To our knowledge, no prospective randomized trials have thus far been performed on endometrial cancer.

机译：背景：以前的研究比较了妇科肿瘤学中将机器人辅助腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术或开放式手术进行比较的研究。据我们所知，迄今为止，尚未对子宫内膜癌进行任何前瞻性随机试验。

著录项

来源
《American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology》 |2016年第5期|共7页
作者
Maenpaa Minna M.; Nieminen Kari; Tomas Eija I.; Laurila Marita; Luukkaala Tiina H.; Maenpaa Johanna U.;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类妇产科学;
关键词
endometrial cancer; gynecologic surgery; operation time; robotic-assisted surgery; traditional laparoscopic surgery;

机译：子宫内膜癌;妇科手术;手术时间;机器人辅助手术;传统腹腔镜手术;
入库时间 2022-08-18 10:00:18

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial REPLY [J] . Maenpaa Minna M., Nieminen Kari, Maenpaa Johanna U. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology . 2017,第6期

机译：机器人辅助与子宫内膜癌的传统腹腔镜手术：随机对照试验答复
2. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial [J] . Maenpaa Minna M., Nieminen Kari, Tomas Eija I., American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology . 2016,第5期

机译：机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜手术治疗子宫内膜癌：一项随机对照试验
3. Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus traditional robotic-assisted surgery (NOTR) for patients with colorectal cancer: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial [J] . Rui Luo, Fangfang Zheng, Haobo Zhang, Trials . 2021,第1期

机译：机器人天然孔口标本提取手术与传统机器人辅助手术（NOTR）对结直肠癌患者：随机对照试验的研究方案
4. Manual Control and Motor Drive Forceps for Laparoscopic Surgery (Forceps Controlled by the Posture of Grip and Suture Work Trials) [C] . Shigeyuki SHIMACHI, Akira HASHIMOTO, Masamichi SAKAGUCHI, 日本ロボット学会学術講演会 . 2001

机译：用于腹腔镜手术手术的手动控制和电机驱动器（通过抓握和缝合工作试验的姿态控制）
5. Evaluating surgical outcomes: A systematic comparison of evidence from randomized trials and observational studies in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. [D] . Martel, Guillaume. 2012

机译：评估手术效果：腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的随机试验和观察性研究证据的系统比较。
6. Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus traditional robotic-assisted surgery (NOTR) for patients with colorectal cancer: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial [O] . Rui Luo, Fangfang Zheng, Haobo Zhang, 2021

机译：机器人天然孔口标本提取手术与传统机器人辅助手术（NOTR）对结直肠癌患者：随机对照试验的研究方案
7. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial [O] . Minna M. Mäenpää, Kari Nieminen, Eija I. Tomás, 2016

机译：机器人辅助对子宫内膜癌的传统腹腔镜手术：随机对照试验

Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅