首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Physical Anthropology >Comparison of dental measurement systems for taxonomic assignment of first molars
【24h】

Comparison of dental measurement systems for taxonomic assignment of first molars

机译:比较第一类臼齿分类的牙科测量系统

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Morphometrics of the molar crown is based traditionally on diameter measurements but is nowadays more often based on 2D image analysis of crown outlines. An alternative approach involves measurements at the level of the cervical line. We compare the information content of the two options in a three-dimensional (3D) digital sample of lower and upper first molars (M _1 and M~1) of modern human and Neanderthal teeth. The cervical outline for each tooth was created by digitizing the cervical line and then sectioning the tooth with a best fit plane. The crown outline was projected onto this same plane. The curves were analyzed by direct extraction of diameters, diagonals, and area and also by principal component analysis either of the residuals obtained by regressing out these measurements from the radii (shape information) or directly by the radii (size and shape information). For M_1, the crown and cervical outline radii allow us to discriminate between Neanderthals and modern humans with 90% and 95% accuracy, respectively. Fairly good discrimination between the groups (80-82.5%) was also obtained using cervical measurements. With respect to M_1, general overlap of the two groups was obtained by both crown and cervical measurements; however, the two taxa were differentiable by crown outline residuals (90-97%). Accordingly, while crown diameters or crown radii should be used for taxonomic analysis of unworn or slightly worn M1s, the crown outline, after regressing out size information, could be promising for taxonomic assignment of lower M1s.
机译:臼齿牙冠的形态计量学传统上是基于直径测量,但如今更多地基于牙冠轮廓的2D图像分析。另一种方法是在宫颈线水平进行测量。我们在现代人牙和尼安德特人牙齿的上下第一磨牙(M _1和M〜1)的三维(3D)数字样本中比较了这两种选择的信息内容。通过数字化子宫颈线,然后用最佳拟合平面对牙齿进行剖切,可以创建每颗牙齿的子宫颈轮廓。牙冠轮廓投影到同一平面上。通过直接提取直径,对角线和面积并通过主成分分析对曲线进行分析,这些残余是通过从半径(形状信息)中减去这些测量值或直接通过半径(尺寸和形状信息)获得的残差来进行的。对于M_1,冠和颈轮廓半径使我们能够分别以90%和95%的精度区分尼安德特人和现代人。使用颈椎测量也可以在两组之间获得很好的区分(80-82.5%)。对于M_1,通过冠和颈椎测量获得了两组的总体重叠。但是,这两个分类单元的冠轮廓轮廓残差是可区分的(90-97%)。因此,虽然应将胎冠直径或胎冠半径用于未磨损或稍有磨损的M1的分类学分析,但在减去尺寸信息后,胎冠轮廓可能会有望用于较低M1的生物分类。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号