首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Surgical Oncology >Improved survival in rectal cancer patients who are treated with long-course versus short-course neoadjuvant radiotherapy: A propensity-matched analysis of the NCDB
【24h】

Improved survival in rectal cancer patients who are treated with long-course versus short-course neoadjuvant radiotherapy: A propensity-matched analysis of the NCDB

机译:改善了长期治疗的直肠癌患者的生存率与短期课程新辅助放射治疗:对NCDB的倾向匹配分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated comparable survival outcomes for short-course (SCRT) and long-course neoadjuvant radiotherapy (LCRT) in patients with rectal cancer. Methods Using the National Cancer Data Base (2004-2015), a propensity score was used to match 188 patients with rectal cancer receiving SCRT to 376 patients receiving LCRT. Perioperative, oncologic, and survival outcomes were compared. Results Patient and clinical tumor characteristics were similar between groups. Patients in the LCRT were more likely to undergo surgery (91% vs 85%; P = 0.03). The LCRT group were more likely to have tumor (T) (56% vs 43%) and nodal (N) (25% vs 19%) downstaging, and a complete pathological response (15% vs 6%) compared with the SCRT group (all P 0.05). Length of stay (6 vs 8 days), 30-day (1% vs 5%) mortality, and 90-day mortality (1% vs 10%) were significantly lower in the LCRT group (all P 0.05). After adjusting for patient and tumor-related characteristics, LCRT was associated with a 50% reduction in the risk of mortality compared with SCRT (hazard ratios, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.70). Conclusions In this analysis, LCRT was superior to SCRT in terms of tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy, perioperative mortality, and overall survival. These findings provide evidence for the use of LCRT when neoadjuvant therapy is indicated.
机译:背景技术随机对照试验表明了直肠癌患者的短程(SCRT)和长期内辅助放射治疗(LCRT)的可比存活结果。方法采用国家癌症数据库(2004-2015),倾向评分用于匹配188例直肠癌接受瘢痕癌的直肠癌患者。比较围手术期,肿瘤和生存结果。结果患者和临床肿瘤特征在组之间相似。 LCRT中的患者更容易发生手术(91%vs 85%; p = 0.03)。 LCRT组更可能具有肿瘤(T)(56%vs 43%)和节点(25%vs19%)下降,与SCRT组相比,完全病理反应(15%vs 6%) (所有P& 0.05)。入住时间(6 vs 8天),30天(5%Vs 5%)死亡率,90天死亡率(1%vs 10%)在LCRT组中显着降低(所有P <0.05)。在调整患者和肿瘤相关的特征后,与SCRT(危险比,0.50; 95%置信区间,0.35-0.70)相比,LCRT与死亡风险降低50%。结论在这种分析中,LCRT在肿瘤反应方面优于瘢痕,对新辅助治疗,围手术期死亡率和整体存活。这些调查结果提供了在指示新辅助治疗时使用LCRT的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号