首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Surgical Oncology >Mechanisms of decision‐making in preoperative assessment for older adult prostate cancer patients—A qualitative study
【24h】

Mechanisms of decision‐making in preoperative assessment for older adult prostate cancer patients—A qualitative study

机译:老年成人前列腺癌患者术前评估决策机制 - 一种定性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract Background and Objective Little research exists which investigates the contextual factors and hidden influences that inform surgeons and surgical teams decision‐making in preoperative assessment when deciding whether to or not to operate on older adult prostate cancer patients living with aging‐associated functional declines and illnesses. The aim of this study is to identify and examine the underlying mechanisms that uniquely shape preoperative surgical decision‐making strategies concerning older adult prostate cancer patients. Methods Qualitative methodologies were used that paired ethnographic field observations with semistructured interviews for data collection. An inductive thematic analysis approach was used to identify, analyze, and describe patterns in the data. Results Factors underlining surgical decision‐making originated from the context of two categories: (1) clinical and surgery‐specific factors; and (2) non‐patient factors. Thematic subcategories included personal experiences, methods of assessment during medical encounters, anticipation of outcomes, perceptions of preoperative assessment instruments for frailty and multimorbidity, routines and workflow patterns, microcultures, and indirect observation and second‐hand knowledge. Conclusion Surgeon's personal experiences has a significant impact on the decision‐making processes during preoperative assessments. However, non‐patient factors such as institutional microcultures passively and actively influence decision‐making process during preoperative assessment.
机译:摘要背景和目标一点研究,研究了语境因素和隐藏的影响,以便在决定是否对患有老化相关功能性下降和疾病的老年人前列腺癌患者进行术前评估时通知外科医生和外科手术团队的决策。 。本研究的目的是识别和检查潜在的机制,术语术前术前手术决策策略有关年龄较大的成人前列腺癌患者。方法使用定性方法,将配对的民族志法场景观察与用于数据收集的半系统访谈。归纳主题分析方法用于识别,分析和描述数据中的模式。结果因素从两类上下期下调外科决策:(1)临床和手术特定因素; (2)非患者因素。专题子类别包括个人经验,医疗期间的评估方法,结果预期,术前评估术前评估工具,常规和工作流程模式,微培养和间接观察和二手知识。结论外科医生的个人经历对术前评估期间对决策过程产生了重大影响。然而,在术前评估期间,非患者微羽盆等机构微量节动力被动和积极地影响决策过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号