首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Surgical Oncology >Systemic review and network meta‐analysis comparing minimal surgical techniques for rectal cancer: quality of total mesorectum excision, pathological, surgical, and oncological outcomes
【24h】

Systemic review and network meta‐analysis comparing minimal surgical techniques for rectal cancer: quality of total mesorectum excision, pathological, surgical, and oncological outcomes

机译:全身审查和网络荟萃分析比较直肠癌的最小手术技术:全培素切除,病理,手术和肿瘤的质量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background Minimal invasive surgery has revolutionized recovery in rectal cancer patients. However, there has been debate on its effect on quality of total mesorectal excision (TME) and oncological outcomes. This network meta‐analysis compares laparoscopic, robotic‐assisted, and transanal TMEs. This study shows that All three surgical techniques are comparable across TME quality and oncological outcomes. Ultimately, good outcomes are based on each individual surgeon choosing an approach based on their expertise.
机译:摘要背景下侵入性手术在直肠癌患者中彻底改变了复苏。 但是,争论了其对总培素切除(TME)和肿瘤的质量的影响。 该网络荟萃分析比较了腹腔镜,机器人辅助和横冲的TMES。 本研究表明,所有三种外科手术技术均在TME质量和肿瘤的结果中可比。 最终,良好的结果是基于每个外科医生根据其专业知识选择一种方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号