首页> 外文期刊>Journal of orthodontics >Treatment duration and gingival inflammation in Angle's Class I malocclusion patients treated with the conventional straight-wire method and the Damon technique: a single-centre, randomised clinical trial
【24h】

Treatment duration and gingival inflammation in Angle's Class I malocclusion patients treated with the conventional straight-wire method and the Damon technique: a single-centre, randomised clinical trial

机译:角度阶级的治疗持续时间和牙龈炎症I级牙粘合患者用传统的直线法和达蒙技术治疗:单中心,随机临床试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective: To compare the duration of orthodontic treatment and Gingival Index (GI) scores in Class I malocclusion patients treated with a conventional straight-wire method (CG) or the Damon technique (DT). Design: Two-arm, parallel, randomised clinical trial Setting: A postgraduate orthodontic clinic Participants: Patients with a balanced facial profile, a full permanent dentition and Angle's Class I malocclusion with moderate crowding. Methods: The primary outcome was the duration of orthodontic treatment in months. Gl scores throughout treatment were secondary outcomes and the PAR index was also assessed. Randomisation was accomplished using a table of random numbers and the allocation was concealed in sequentially numbered and opened, opaque, sealed envelopes. Blinding was applicable for PAR assessment only. Comparison of data between groups was performed with appropriate tests for independent samples. Results: Twenty-two patients were randomly allocated to treatment in a 1:1 ratio to either CG or DT group. Age at the start of treatment, initial PAR index and GI scores were similar between groups. All patients completed the study, but the total duration of orthodontic treatment was almost half of the initial assumption. No statistically significant differences were observed in treatment duration (CG: Mean (x) = 14.5 months, Standard Deviation (SD) = ±3.03; DT: x= 12.25 months, SD = ±2.93; 95% Confidence Interval: -0.40 to 4.90; P= 0.093; t-test). The two groups did not differ statistically regarding the GI scores during the observational period. No serious harms were observed other than gingival inflammation associated with oral biofilm accumulation. Conclusions: The present study did not reveal statistically significant differences between the compared, conventional straight-wire method and Damon technique-treated, Angle's Class I malocclusion groups regarding total treatment duration and GI scores.
机译:目的:比较用传统直线法(CG)或DAMON技术(DT)治疗的I类咬合患者的正畸治疗和牙龈指数(GI)评分的持续时间。设计:双臂,并行,随机临床试验环境:研究生正畸诊所参与者:患有平衡面部型材的患者,一个完整的永久性牙齿和角度的级别,我的血栓沉入中等拥挤。方法:主要结果是数月内矫正治疗的持续时间。 GL分数整个治疗是二次结果,也评估了分析指数。使用随机数表完成随机化,并在顺序编号和打开,不透明,密封的信封中隐藏分配。致盲仅适用于分析评估。通过适当的独立样品进行组之间进行组之间的数据比较。结果:将二十二名患者随机分配给1:1的比例,与CG或DT组一起治疗。在治疗开始时的年龄,初始标准指数和GI分数在组之间相似。所有患者完成了该研究,但正畸治疗的总持续时间几乎是初始假设的一半。在治疗持续时间内没有观察到统计学上显着的差异(CG:平均(x)= 14.5个月,标准偏差(SD)=±3.03; DT:X = 12.25个月,SD =±2.93; 95%置信区间:-0.40至4.90 ; p = 0.093; t检验)。两组在观察期间没有对GI分数有统计学上的差异。除了与口服生物膜积累相关的牙龈炎症之外,没有观察到严重危害。结论:本研究未揭示比较,传统的直线方法和达蒙技术处理,角度的I类咬合组之间的统计学上显着差异,这是关于总治疗持续时间和GI分数的术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号