...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews >Motivational interviewing to improve adherence behaviours for the prevention of diabetic foot ulceration
【24h】

Motivational interviewing to improve adherence behaviours for the prevention of diabetic foot ulceration

机译:激励面试改善预防糖尿病足溃疡的粘附行为

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Diabetic foot ulceration is a major complication associated with high morbidity. Little evidence exists on which interventions are effective at preventing ulceration. Participants who are adherent to self‐care behaviours have significantly better outcomes. Motivational interviewing is an intervention that has been used successfully for conditions where adherence is important, such as reduction of obesity and HbA1c levels. A systematic review was conducted to determine whether motivational interviewing is effective at improving adherence for the prevention of Diabetic Foot Ulceration. Electronic searches were run without date or language restrictions in MEDLINE (viaEBSCOhost), CINAHL (viaEBSCOhost), ProQuest (Health and Medical Collection, Nursing and Allied Health Database, PsycINFO, Psychology, PsychArticles), AMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science Core Collections. Papers were included if participants had or were at risk of diabetic foot ulceration. Studies required motivational interviewing or a motivational approach as the sole intervention or as a component. Randomised controlled trials and quasi‐experimental studies were included if ulceration and/or at least one behavioural outcome was measured before and after the intervention. Five studies met the inclusion criteria. Heterogeneity prevented the pooling of data. One study used motivational interviewing as the sole intervention. This study found a short‐term positive effect on footwear adherence. The remaining four studies had a motivational component within their interventions. Two of these studies showed the intervention to be effective but both were at a high risk of bias. This review demonstrates an evidence gap. More research is needed.
机译:糖尿病足溃疡是一种与高发病率相关的主要复杂性。少数证据存在哪些干预措施在预防溃疡方面是有效的。遵守自我保健行为的参与者具有更好的结果。励志面试是一种干预,该干预已成功用于遵守重要性的条件,例如减少肥胖和HBA1C水平。进行了系统审查,以确定励志面试是否有效改善预防糖尿病足溃疡的依从性。在没有Medline(VIAEBSCOHOST),CINAHL(VIEEBSCOHOST),PROQUEST(健康和医疗收集,护理和盟军的健康数据库,PSYCINFO,心理学,精神上),CAMED,EMBASE,Cochrane中央登记册中的受控试验,科学核心和科学核心系列的网络。如果参与者有或有患糖尿病足溃疡的风险,则包括纸张。研究所需的励志访谈或作为唯一干预或组件的动机方法。如果溃疡和/或至少在干预之前和之后测量至少一种行为结果,则包括随机对照试验和准实验研究。五项研究符合纳入标准。异质性阻止了数据的汇集。一项研究用来作为唯一干预的诱导面试。这项研究发现了对鞋类粘附的短期积极影响。其余的四项研究在其干预措施中具有激励组成部分。这些研究中的两个表现出有效的干预,但两者都处于高风险。该评论证明了证据差距。需要更多的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号