...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of general internal medicine >Expert Recommendations on Frequency of Utilization of Common Laboratory Tests in Medical Inpatients: a Canadian Consensus Study
【24h】

Expert Recommendations on Frequency of Utilization of Common Laboratory Tests in Medical Inpatients: a Canadian Consensus Study

机译:关于医疗住院患者使用常见实验室测试频率的专家建议:加拿大共识研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Repetitive inpatient laboratory testing in the face of clinical stability is a marker of low-value care. However, for commonly encountered clinical scenarios on medical units, there are no guidelines defining appropriate use criteria for laboratory tests. Objective This study seeks to establish consensus-based recommendations for the utilization of common laboratory tests in medical inpatients. Design This study uses a modified Delphi method. Participants completed two rounds of an online survey to determine appropriate testing frequencies for selected laboratory tests in commonly encountered clinical scenarios. Consensus was defined as agreement by at least 80% of participants. Participants Participants were 36 experts in internal medicine across Canada defined as internists in independent practice for >= 5 years with experience in medical education, quality improvement, or both. Experts represented 8 of the 10 Canadian provinces and 13 of 17 academic institutions. Main Measures Laboratory tests and clinical scenarios included were those that were considered common on medical units. The final survey contained a total of 45 clinical scenarios looking at the utilization of six laboratory tests (complete blood count, electrolytes, creatinine, urea, international normalized ratio, and partial thromboplastin time). The possible frequency choices were every 2-4 h, 6-8 h, twice a day, daily, every 2-3 days, weekly, or none unless there was specific diagnostic suspicion. These scenarios were reviewed by two internists with training in quality improvement and survey methods. Key Results Of the 45 initial clinical scenarios included, we reached consensus on 17 scenarios. We reached weak consensus on an additional 19 scenarios by combining two adjacent frequency categories. Conclusions A Canadian expert panel of internists has provided frequency recommendations on the utilization of six common laboratory tests in medical inpatients. These recommendations need validation in prospective studies to assess whether restrictive versus liberal laboratory test ordering impacts patient outcomes.
机译:背景技术在临床稳定性面前的重复住院病验实验室测试是低价值护理的标记。但是,对于在医疗单位的常见临床情景中,没有指导有关实验室测试的适当使用标准的指导方针。目的本研究旨在建立基于共识的建议,以利用医疗住院患者的共同实验室测试。设计本研究使用修改的Delphi方法。参与者完成了两轮的在线调查,以确定在常见的临床情景中所选实验室测试的适当测试频率。共识被定义为至少80%的参与者的协议。参与者参与者在加拿大跨国医学中的36名专家定义为独立实践中的内科医生> = 5年,具有医学教育,质量改进或两者的经验。专家代表了10个加拿大10个省份和13个学术机构的13个。主要措施实验室测试和临床情景包括在医疗单位上被认为是常见的。最终调查含有45个临床情景,旨在利用六种实验室测试(完整的血统,电解质,肌酐,尿素,国际归一化比和部分血栓形成时间)。可能的频率选择每2-4小时,6-8小时,每天两次,每日两次,每周2-3天,每周,或者,除非有特定的诊断怀疑。这些情景由两个内科医生审查,具有质量改进和调查方法的培训。 45个初始临床情景的关键结果包括在17个方案上达成了共识。通过组合两个相邻的频率类别,我们在额外的19个方面达成了薄弱共识。结论一个关于内科医生的加拿大专家小组提出了有关在医疗住院患者的六种常见实验室测试的情况下提供频率建议。这些建议需要在预期研究中验证,以评估限制性与自由主义实验室测试订购影响是否会影响患者结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号