首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation >Evaluation of the relationship between the minimum inhibitory concentration of ceftiofur and third-generation cephalosporins in Escherichia coli isolates from food-producing animals
【24h】

Evaluation of the relationship between the minimum inhibitory concentration of ceftiofur and third-generation cephalosporins in Escherichia coli isolates from food-producing animals

机译:从食物生产动物中<斜氏素和第三代头孢菌素的最小抑制浓度与第三代头孢菌素的关系的评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

>To enable future comparison of the antimicrobial susceptibility data between bacteria obtained from animals and humans, it is necessary to compare the relationships between minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of veterinary and human medicine. We evaluated the relationship between the MIC of ceftiofur (CTF) and the MICs of other third-generation cephalosporins (TGCs): cefotaxime (CTX), cefpodoxime (CPDX), and ceftazidime (CAZ), determined by the broth microdilution method using 118 cefazolin-resistant Escherichia coli isolates from food-producing animals. Using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute criteria, very major classification errors were observed only in CAZ (17.8%, 21 of 118); major and minor errors were observed in all TGCs (CTX: 0.8% [1 of 118] and 9.3% [11 of 118]; CPDX: 9.3% [11 of 118] and 6.8% [8 of 118]; CAZ: 2.5% [3 of 118] and 9.3% [11 of 118], respectively). The Spearman correlation coefficients between the MICs of CTF and CTX, CPDX, and CAZ were 0.765, 0.731, and 0.306, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity values were 100.0% and 81.8% for CTX, 99.0% and 27.3% for CPDX, and 76.0% and 86.4% for CAZ compared with CTF. The C-statistic was 0.978 for CTF and CTX, 0.953 for CPDX, and 0.798 for CAZ. For the TGCs evaluated in our study, testing for CTX susceptibility results showed the highest correlation with the results given when testing for CTF susceptibility.
机译:>为了使未来比较从动物和人类获得的细菌之间的细菌之间的抗微生物易感性数据,有必要比较兽医和人类的最小抑制浓度(MIC)之间的关系。我们评估了头孢噻呋喃(CTF)的MIC与其他第三代头孢菌素(TGCS)的麦克风(CTX),头孢噻肟(CTX),头孢噻肟(CPDX)和CEFTALIDIME(CAZ)之间的关系,由使用118个CeFazolin确定的肉汤微量稀释方法-Resistant <斜视>大肠杆菌分离食品动物的分离物。使用临床和实验室标准研究所标准,仅在CAZ中观察到非常重大的分类错误(17.8%,共118名);在所有TGCS(CTX:0.8%[118个]和9.3%[118个中的9.3%]; CPDX:9.3%[118]和6.8%[118]中的主要误差,68%]; CAZ:2.5% [118]和9.3%[118个],共118%])。 CTF和CTX,CPDX和CAZ的MIC之间的SPEARMAN相关系数分别为0.765,0.731和0.306。 CTX的敏感性和特异性值为100.0%和81.8%,CPDX的99.0%和27.3%,与CTF相比,CAD的76.0%和86.4%。 CTF和CTX的C统计为0.978,CTX为CPDX为0.953,CAZ为0.798。对于在我们的研究中评估的TGCS,CTX易感性结果的测试表现出最高的相关性与测试CTF易感性时给出的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号