首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology: JEADV >A survey among dermatologists: diagnostics of superficial fungal infections - what is used and what is needed to initiate therapy and assess efficacy?
【24h】

A survey among dermatologists: diagnostics of superficial fungal infections - what is used and what is needed to initiate therapy and assess efficacy?

机译:皮肤科医生的调查:浅表性真菌感染的诊断 - 所使用的是什么以及开始治疗和评估疗效所需的内容?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Superficial fungal infections are common. It is important to confirm the clinical diagnosis by mycological laboratory methods before initiating systemic antifungal treatment, especially as antifungal sensitivity and in vitro susceptibility may differ between different genera and species. For many years, the gold standard for diagnosis of superficial fungal infections has been direct fungal detection in the clinical specimen (microscopy) supplemented by culturing. Lately, newer molecular based methods for fungal identification have been developed. Objective This study was initiated to focus on the current usage of mycological diagnostics for superficial fungal infections by dermatologists. It was designed to investigate whether it was necessary to differentiate between initial diagnostic tests and those used at treatment follow-up in specific superficial fungal infections. Methods An online questionnaire was distributed among members of the EADV mycology Task Force and other dermatologists with a special interest in mycology and nail disease. Results The survey was distributed to 62 dermatologists of whom 38 (61%) completed the whole survey, 7 (11%) partially completed and 17 (27%) did not respond. Nearly, all respondents (82-100%) said that ideally they would use the result of direct microscopy (or histology) combined with a genus/species directed treatment of onychomycosis, dermatophytosis, Candida- and Malassezia-related infections. The majority of the dermatologists used a combination of clinical assessment and direct microscopy for treatment assessment and the viability of the fungus was considered more important at this visit than when initiating the treatment. Molecular based methods were not available for all responders. Conclusion The available diagnostic methods are heterogeneous and their usage differs between different practices as well as between countries. The survey confirmed that dermatologists find it important to make a mycological diagnosis, particularly prior to starting oral antifungal treatment in order to confirm the diagnose and target the therapy according to genus and species.
机译:背景技术浅表真菌感染是常见的。重要的是在发起全身抗真菌治疗之前,确认Mycological实验室方法的临床诊断,尤其是抗真菌敏感性和体外易感性之间的不同之处在于不同的属和物种。多年来,浅表性感染诊断的黄金标准一直在培养的临床标本(显微镜)中直接的真菌检测。最近,已经开发出新的基于分子的真菌鉴定方法。目的是开始关注皮肤科医生对浅表性真菌感染的目前使用Mycological诊断的目前。它旨在调查是否有必要区分初始诊断测试和在特定浅表性真菌感染中的治疗随访中使用的那些。方法在EADV Mycology工作队的成员和其他皮肤科医生的成员中分发了在线问卷,具有特别兴趣的Mycology和指甲疾病。结果调查分布到62位皮肤科,其中38名(61%)完成全面调查,7(11%)部分完成,17(27%)没有回应。近,所有受访者(82-100%)表示,理想情况下,他们将使用直接显微镜(或组织学)的结果与甲癣,皮肤病,念珠菌和malassezia相关感染的属/物种联合治疗。大多数皮肤病学家使用临床评估和直接显微镜的组合进行治疗评估,并且真菌的活力在这次访问中被认为比开始治疗更重要。所有响应者都没有基于分子的方法。结论可用的诊断方法是异构的,其用法在不同的实践和国家之间的不同之处。该调查证实,皮肤科医生发现进行Mycological诊断,特别是在开始口服抗真菌治疗之前,为了确认诊断并根据属性靶向治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号