...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of sport rehabilitation >Comparison of Hip- and Back-Muscle Activity and Pelvic Compensation in Healthy Subjects During 3 Different Prone Table Hip-Extension Exercises
【24h】

Comparison of Hip- and Back-Muscle Activity and Pelvic Compensation in Healthy Subjects During 3 Different Prone Table Hip-Extension Exercises

机译:3次不同易于俯卧位髋关节延长练习中健康受试者髋关节和背部肌肉活性和盆腔补偿的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Context: Prone hip extension has been recommended for strengthening the back and hip muscles. Previous studies have investigated prone hip extension conducted with subjects on the floor in the prone position. However, no study has compared 3 different table hip-extension (THE) positions in terms of the activities of the back-and hip-joint muscles with lumbopelvic motion. Objective: To identify more effective exercises for strengthening the gluteus maximus (GM) by comparing 3 different exercises (THE alone, THE with the abdominal drawing-in maneuver [THEA], and THEA with chair support under the knee [THEAC]) based on electromyographic muscle activity and pelvic compensation. Design: Repeated-measure within-subject intervention. Setting: University research laboratory. Participants: 16 healthy men. Main Outcome Measures: Surface electromyography (EMG) was used to obtain data on the GM, erector spinae (ES), multifidus, biceps femoris (BF), and semitendinosus (ST). Pelvic compensation was monitored using an electromagnetic motion-tracking device. Exertion during each exercise was recorded. Any significant difference in electromyographic muscle activity and pelvic motion among the 3 conditions (THE vs THEA vs THEAC) was assessed using a 1-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni post hoc test. Results: The muscle activities recorded by EMG differed significantly among the 3 exercises (P <.01). GM activity was increased significantly during THEAC (P <.01). There was a significant difference in lumbopelvic kinematics in terms of anterior tilting (F=19.49, P <.01) and rotation (F = 27.38, P <.01) among the 3 exercises. Conclusions: The THEAC exercise was the most effective for strengthening the GM without overactivity of the ES, BF, and ST muscles and lumbopelvic compensation compared with THE and THEA.
机译:背景信息:建议加强背部和髋关节肌肉的俯卧率延期。以前的研究已经调查了在俯卧位的俯卧位进行的俯卧率延伸。然而,在带有腰椎运动的后髋关节肌肉的活动方面,没有研究比较了3种不同的表臀部延伸(该)职位。目的:通过比较3种不同的练习(单独的,与腹部绘制的机动[Thea],以及膝盖[TheAC]下的椅子支持)来确定更有效的锻炼肌科肌肉活动和盆腔补偿。设计:对象内的重复测量。环境:大学研究实验室。参与者:16名健康男性。主要结果措施:表面肌电学(EMG)用于获得GM,ERCORES SPINAE(ES),MultiFIFU,雌性雌性(BF)和SEMITENINOSUS(ST)的数据。使用电磁动作跟踪装置监测盆腔补偿。记录每次运动期间的劳累。使用Bonferroni后Hoc测试使用双重反复测量分析(ANOVA)的单向反复措施分析评估了3条件(VS THEA VS THEAC)中的电拍摄肌活动和盆腔运动的任何显着差异。结果:在3次练习中,EMG记录的肌肉活动有显着不同(P <.01)。在THEC期间,GM活性显着增加(P <.01)。在前倾斜(F = 19.49,P <.01)和3次练习中的旋转(F = 27.38,P <.01)方面存在显着差异。结论:THEAC运动是加强GM最有效的,而不是与ES,BF和ST肌肉和腰肌的过度相比,与和THEA相比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号