...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of sport rehabilitation >Balance Training Versus Balance Training With STARS in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability: A Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

Balance Training Versus Balance Training With STARS in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability: A Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:平衡培训与慢性踝关节不稳定患者患者的平衡训练:随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Context: Both balance training and selected interventions meant to target sensory structures (STARS) have been shown to be effective at restoring deficits associated with chronic ankle instability (CAI). Clinicians often use multiple treatment modalities in patients with CAI. However, evidence for combined intervention effectiveness in CAI patients remains limited. Objective: To determine if augmenting a balance-training protocol with STARS (BTS) results in greater improvements than balance training (BT) alone in those with CAI. Design: Randomized-controlled trial. Setting: Research laboratory. Patients: 24 CAI participants (age 21.3 +/- 2.0 y; height 169.8 +/- 12.9 cm; mass 72.5 +/- 22.2 kg) were randomized into 2 groups: BT and BTS. Interventions: Participants completed a 4-week progression-based balance-training protocol consisting of 3 20-min sessions per week. The experimental group also received a 5-min set of STARS treatments consisting of calf stretching, plantar massage, ankle joint mobilizations, and ankle joint traction before each balance-training session. Main Outcome Measures: Outcomes included self-assessed disability, Star Excursion Balance Test reach distance, and time-to-boundary calculated from static balance trials. All outcomes were assessed before, and 24-hours and 1-week after protocol completion. Self-assessed disability was also captured 1-month after the intervention. Results: No significant group differences were identified (P >.10). Both groups demonstrated improvements in all outcome categories after the interventions (P <.10), many of which were retained at 1-week posttest (P <.10). Although 90% CIs include zero, effect sizes favor BTS. Similarly, only the BTS group exceeded the minimal detectable change for time-to-boundary outcomes. Conclusions: While statistically no more effective, exceeding minimal detectable change scores and favorable effect sizes suggest that a 4-week progressive BTS program may be more effective at improving self-assessed disability and postural control in CAI patients than balance training in isolation.
机译:背景信息:余额培训和所选干预措施意味着针对靶向感官结构(星)恢复与慢性脚踝不稳定性(CAI)相关的恢复缺陷。临床医生经常使用CAI患者的多种治疗方式。然而,蔡患者组合干预效果的证据仍然有限。目的:确定是否使用恒星(BTS)增强平衡培训协议,从而在与CAI中单独的平衡训练(BT)更大的改进。设计:随机对照试验。环境:研究实验室。患者:24例参与者(21.3岁+/- 2.0 y;高度169.8 +/- 12.9厘米;质量72.5 +/-22.2 kg)被随机分为2组:BT和BTS。干预措施:参与者完成了4周的基于进步的余额培训议定书,每周包含3个20分钟的课程。实验组还收到了一组5分钟的恒星治疗,包括小牛拉伸,跖骨按摩,踝关节动员和每个余额培训课程之前的踝关节牵引。主要观察措施:结果包括自我评估的残疾,明星偏移平衡试验到达距离,以及从静态平衡试验计算的时间到边界。在议定书完成后24小时和24小时和1周评估所有结果。干预后1个月也捕获了自我评估的残疾。结果:鉴定不明显群体差异(P> .10)。两组在干预措施(P <0.10)之后,两组都证明了所有结果类别的改善,其中许多在1周后保留(P <.10)。虽然90%的顺式包括零,效果大小优惠BTS。类似地,仅BTS组超过最小可检测的变化,用于时间 - 边界结果。结论:虽然统计上没有更有效,但超过最小的可检测变化分数和有利的效果大小表明,4周的进步BTS程序在改善蔡患者中的自我评估残疾和姿势对照时比平衡训练在分离中更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号