首页> 外文期刊>Journal of palliative medicine >Interprofessional Work in Serious Illness Communication in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study
【24h】

Interprofessional Work in Serious Illness Communication in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study

机译:初级保健中严重疾病沟通的思想工作:一个定性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Evidence demonstrates that discussion between clinicians and seriously ill patients about their goals and preferences, or serious illness communication, is a high-value intervention, resulting in growing demand for improvement in this area. Promising efforts address this demand utilizing interprofessional teams; yet, we lack insight into how different professions work together to deliver better serious illness communication. Objective: To explore the perceptions of primary care clinicians about interprofessional work in serious illness communication. Design: Qualitative analysis of semistructured key informant interviews. Settings/Subjects: Primary care clinicians (physicians, care coordination nurses, and social workers) who have experience implementing a structured primary palliative care program, the Serious Illness Care Program, at a large academic medical center in Boston, Massachusetts. Results: We derived primary themes and subthemes from participant descriptions of program implementation: the importance and value of interprofessional teams, nurses, and individual initiative; the role of preparation and structure in enabling high-quality communication; and the ways in which attempts to improve serious illness communication reveal other problems that can limit program effectiveness or be perceived as program failures. We derived a conceptual model that illustrates the relationships between interprofessional team interactions, workflows, and perceived program outcomes. Conclusions: This study suggests three key areas of focus for design and implementation of programs aimed at improving serious illness conversations by interprofessional primary care teams: establishing clear professional roles and responsibilities, paying special attention to interprofessional and clinician-patient relationships, and clearly structuring interventions aiming to change the way our system drives serious illness communication.
机译:背景:证据表明,临床医生与严重患者之间的讨论,或严重的患者或严重的疾病沟通是一种高价值的干预,导致对该领域的改善需求不断增长。有希望的努力解决了这种需求,利用侦探团队;然而,我们缺乏洞察不同的职业如何共同努力,以提供更好的严重疾病沟通。目的:探讨初级保健临床医生关于严重疾病沟通思想工作的看法。设计:半系统的定性分析。设定/主题:初级保健临床医生(医生,护理协调护士和社会工作者),他们拥有在马萨诸塞州波士顿波士顿的大型学术医疗中心实施结构化的主要姑息治疗计划的经验。结果:我们从方案实施的参与者说明中派生了主要主题和次议题:争取团队,护士和个人倡议的重要性和价值;制备和结构在实现高质量沟通方面的作用;以及改善严重疾病沟通的尝试揭示了其他可能限制计划有效性或被视为计划失败的问题。我们派生了一个概念模型,说明了贸易委员团队互动,工作流程和感知计划结果之间的关系。结论:本研究表明,三个关键的设计和实施方案的关键领域,旨在通过思想初级保健团队改善严重疾病谈话:建立明确的专业角色和责任,特别注意侦查和临床医生关系,并明确构建干预措施旨在改变我们的系统推动严重疾病的方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号