首页> 外文期刊>Journal of plastic surgery and hand surgery. >The value of remembered pre-operative quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (QuickDASH) scores
【24h】

The value of remembered pre-operative quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (QuickDASH) scores

机译:记住的臂,肩部和手(QuickDash)分数的记忆术快速残疾的价值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It would be useful if it were possible for the patients to recreate their pre-operative QuickDASH scores in audits where this score had not been recorded before surgery. We assessed the accuracy of remembered pre-operative QuickDASH scores among 229 consecutive patients and the value of a previously developed algorithm for correcting these scores. Real pre-operative scores and remembered pre-operative scores were compared after a mean of 21 months. Furthermore, the scores of a subgroup of 79 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome, subacromial impingement, thumb basal joint arthrosis or Dupuytren's contracture were corrected using an algorithm. The mean difference between remembered and real pre-operative scores for all patients showed heteroscedacity in the Bland-Altman plot. The scores of the 79 sub-analysis patients were homoscedastic. The mean difference between remembered and real pre-operative scores was 9 (SD 16, SEM 1.85). Correcting the scores of the sub-group patients using our algorithm decreased the variation only moderately. The remembered pre-operative score is too inaccurate to be useful in individual patients, also when using our algorithm. However, subtracting nine from the mean remembered pre-operative score in a group of patients with any of the above diagnoses gives the real pre-operative score within the 95% confidence interval of four above and four below the real score.
机译:如果患者可以在审核中重新创建术前尚未在手术前记录的审核中重新创建他们的术前QuickDash分数,这将是有用的。我们评估了229名连续患者中记得的预操作QuickDash分数的准确性,以及以前发达的算法的校正这些分数的算法。在21个月的平均值后比较真正的术前分数和记忆的术前评分。此外,使用算法校正了79例腕管综合征,亚群冲击,拇指基部关节关节或杜普ytren挛缩患者的79名患者的分数。所有患者的记忆和实际术前评分之间的平均差异在Bland-Altman图中显示出异教束性。 79个分析患者的分数是同性恋的。记住和实际术前评分之间的平均差异为9(SD 16,SEM 1.85)。使用我们的算法校正子组患者的分数仅次于中度变化。在使用我们的算法时,记忆的前术评分太不准确以适用于个体患者。然而,从任何上述诊断中的一组患者中减去了九个患者中的任何患者中的患者,使其在上述四个和四个下方的95%置信区间内的实际术前评分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号