首页> 外文期刊>Journal of rehabilitation medicine : >Effects of Telehealth by Allied Health Professionals and Nurses in Rural and Remote Areas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Effects of Telehealth by Allied Health Professionals and Nurses in Rural and Remote Areas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:盟军卫生专业人士和护士在农村和偏远地区的影响:系统审查与荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To describe telehealth interventions delivered by allied health professionals and nurses in rural and remote areas, and to compare the effects of telehealth interventions with standard face-to-face interventions. Data sources: CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO and PubMeddatabases were searched. The content of relevant journals and published articles were also searched. Study selection: Studies examining the effectiveness of allied health and nursing telehealth interventions for rural and remote populations were included in descriptive analyses. Studiescomparing telehealth intervention with standard face-to-face interventions grouped by type of intervention approach were used to examine between-groups effect sizes. Data extraction: Methodological quality of studies was rated using the QualSyst critical appraisal tool and the NationalHealth and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Evidence Hierarchy levels. Data synthesis: After quality ratings, 43 studies were included. A majority of studies had strong methodological quality. The disciplines of psychology and nursing were represented most frequently, as were studiesusing a cognitive intervention approach. Meta-analysis results slightly favoured telehealth interventions compared with face-to-face interventions, but did not show significant differences. Interventions using a combined physical and cognitive approach appeared to be more effective. Conclusion:Telehealth services may be as effective as face-to-face interventions, which is encouraging given the potential benefits of telehealth in rural and remote areas with regards to healthcare access and time and cost savings.
机译:目的:描述盟国卫生专业人员和农村和偏远地区护士提供的远程健康干预,并比较远程健康干预措施与标准面对面干预措施的影响。搜查了数据来源:搜查了CINAHL,EMBASE,PSYCINFO和PUBMEDDATABASES。还搜索了相关期刊和公布的文章的内容。学习选择:在描述性分析中,包括研究盟国健康和护理遥控器干预措施的研究。使用介入方法分组的标准面对面干预措施进行研究,用于审查组之间的效果大小。数据提取:使用Qualsyst批判性评估工具和国家健康和医学研究委员会(NHMRC)证据等级评估研究的方法论质量。数据合成:质量评级后,包括43项研究。大多数研究具有强大的方法质量。心理学和护理的学科最常见,因为研究了一种认知干预方法。荟萃分析结果略有偏爱遥气干预措施与面对面干预相比,但没有显示出显着的差异。使用组合的身体和认知方法的干预似乎更有效。结论:远程健康服务可能与面对面的干预措施有效,这是令人鼓舞的是,在农村和偏远地区的潜在利益方面,在农村和偏远地区的医疗保健和时间和成本节省。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号