首页> 外文期刊>Journal of psycholinguistic research >The Potential Relationship Between Openness and Explicit Versus Implicit L2 Knowledge
【24h】

The Potential Relationship Between Openness and Explicit Versus Implicit L2 Knowledge

机译:开放性与显式与隐式L2知识之间的潜在关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recent studies of second language (L2) construction learning using artificial linguistic systems have begun to closely examine the role of individual differences, including personality. In such studies, adult participants learn form-meaning mappings after exposure, with scores on generalization tests as a standard criterion for learning. This paper addresses the potential role of openness in explicit versus implicit knowledge. The present research relied on a reanalysis of data from a previous study, using an extreme-groups design involving 60 participants. It was revealed that scores when using implicit versus explicit knowledge sources varied by openness. In particular, though both groups performed significantly above chance when using rules, only open learners did so when using intuition. Furthermore, learners with higher openness scores outperformed those lower in openness, based on mixed-effects regression models. This preliminary evidence for the role of openness is discussed in terms of its theoretical and methodological implications.
机译:使用人工语言系统的第二语言(L2)施工学习的最近研究已经开始密切研究个性差异,包括个性的角色。在此类研究中,成人参与者在曝光后学习形式意义映射,以泛化测试进行得分作为学习的标准标准。本文解决了开放在明确与隐含知识中的潜在作用。目前的研究依赖于通过涉及60名参与者的极端群体设计来依赖于前一项研究的数据的分析。据揭示了使用隐式与明确知识源的分数因开放性而变化。特别是,虽然两个组在使用规则时显着执行,但是在使用直觉时,只有开放的学习者才能这样做。此外,基于混合效应回归模型,具有更高开放性的学习者优于开放性下降的学习者。在理论和方法的影响方面讨论了开放作用的这种初步证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号