...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of psychoeducational assessment >Concurrent and Predictive Validity of the Raven Progressive Matrices and the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test
【24h】

Concurrent and Predictive Validity of the Raven Progressive Matrices and the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test

机译:乌鸦逐渐矩阵的并发和预测有效性和Naglieri非语言能力测试

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The concurrent and predictive validities of the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test (NNAT) and Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices (CPM) were investigated in a large group of Italian third-and fifth-grade students with different sociocultural levels evaluated at the beginning and end of the school year. CPM and NNAT scores were related to math and reading comprehension tests. The CPM and NNAT concurrent and predictive validity coefficients were moderate, and there were no differences between concurrent and predictive validities with reading scores. The mutual incremental concurrent validity of the NNAT with the math test was significantly higher than the corresponding CPM validity. Finally, via step-down hierarchical regression analysis, the authors found that the predictive validity of both nonverbal tests is independent from the participants' sociocultural level. These two relatively simple nonverbal tests are commonly used to assess general ability; however, the present study shows that they can also provide useful information for predicting the academic performance of students with different sociocultural levels.
机译:在一大群意大利第三和五年级学生中调查了Naglieri非语言能力测试(NNAT)和Raven的彩色进步矩阵(CPM)的并发和预测有效性在学校开始和结束时评估了不同的社会文化层次年。 CPM和NNAT分数与数学和阅读理解测试有关。 CPM和NNAT并发和预测有效性系数是中等的,并且在具有阅读分数的并发和预测效力之间没有差异。 NNAT与数学测试的相互增量并发有效性显着高于相应的CPM有效性。最后,通过降压等级回归分析,作者发现,非语言测试的预测有效性与参与者的社会文化层面无关。这两个相对简单的非语言测试通常用于评估一般能力;然而,本研究表明,它们还可以提供有用的信息,以预测具有不同社会文化层面的学生的学术表现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号