首页> 外文期刊>American journal of dentistry >Microhardness recovery of demineralized enamel after treatment with fluoride gel or CPP-ACP paste applied topically or with dielectrophoresis
【24h】

Microhardness recovery of demineralized enamel after treatment with fluoride gel or CPP-ACP paste applied topically or with dielectrophoresis

机译:用氟化物凝胶或经局部电泳或介电泳的CPP-ACP糊剂处理后的软化釉质的显微硬度恢复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: To evaluate the microhardness of demineralized enamel remineralized in saliva after applying 1.23% APF gel or CCP-ACP paste with dielectrophoresis (DEP) or diffusion for 3 minutes. Methods: In this laboratory study, 25 enamel blocks of bovine incisors were soaked in demineralizing solution (10 mM HC1 pH 2.5) for 10 minutes and remineralized in saliva for 1 hour, after applying 1.23% APF gel or CPP-ACP paste without fluoride with dielectrophoresis or conventional topical application for 3 minutes. The mean and percentage changes of surface microhardness in pre-demineralization, post-demineralization and remineralization stages were measured in the five groups. The results of all five groups during the three stages were compared by ANOVA and paired t-tests (P= 0.05). Results: The average surface microhardness recovery of APF gel (12,300 ppm fluoride) applied with DEP was higher than APF gel applied topically, or CPP-ACP paste applied with DEP or topically, and water control (P< 0.05). The percentage of surface microhardness recovery for APF+DEP, APF+Diffusion, CPP-ACP+DEP, CPP-ACP+Diffusion, and water control were 88.17%, 13.62%, 7.14%, 5.45%, and 4.02%, respectively. Demineralization treatment decreased the surface microhardness of enamel in all groups and the surface microhardness recovery in the APF+DEP group was significant (P< 0.001). The only significant paired difference was between APF+DEP and all other groups. No other paired difference approached significance. Surface microhardness recovery of enamel with APF+DEP was 12 times or 1,200% greater than APF gel applied topically, and CPP-ACP paste either applied topically or with DEP in one 3- minute application.
机译:目的:评估在应用1.23%APF凝胶或CCP-ACP糊剂并进行介电电泳(DEP)或扩散3分钟后,唾液中再矿化的釉质的显微硬度。方法:在本实验室研究中,将25块牛牙门牙釉质块浸入去矿物质溶液(10 mM HCl pH 2.5)中10分钟,然后在唾液中再矿化1小时,之后再加入1.23%APF凝胶或不含氟化物的CPP-ACP糊剂。介电泳或常规局部应用3分钟。在这五个组中测量了去矿化前,去矿化后和再矿化阶段表面显微硬度的平均值和百分比变化。通过ANOVA和配对t检验比较了三个阶段中所有五个组的结果(P = 0.05)。结果:与DEP一起使用的APF凝胶(12,300 ppm氟化物)的平均表面显微硬度恢复率高于局部使用的APF凝胶,或使用DEP的CPP-ACP糊剂或局部控制的水(P <0.05)。 APF + DEP,APF + Diffusion,CPP-ACP + DEP,CPP-ACP + Diffusion和水控制的表面显微硬度恢复百分比分别为88.17%,13.62%,7.14%,5.45%和4.02%。除盐处理降低了所有组的牙釉质的表面显微硬度,并且APF + DEP组的表面显微硬度恢复显着(P <0.001)。唯一的显着配对差异是APF + DEP与所有其他组之间的差异。没有其他成对的差异达到显着性。使用APF + DEP的瓷釉的表面显微硬度恢复率是局部应用的APF凝胶的12倍或1200%,而局部应用或与DEP组合使用CPP-ACP糊剂则需要3分钟。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号