首页> 外文期刊>Journal of prosthodontics: official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists >Clinical Comparative Evaluation of Nd:YAG Laser and a New Varnish Containing Casein Phosphopeptides‐Amorphous Calcium Phosphate for the Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity: A Prospective Study
【24h】

Clinical Comparative Evaluation of Nd:YAG Laser and a New Varnish Containing Casein Phosphopeptides‐Amorphous Calcium Phosphate for the Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity: A Prospective Study

机译:Nd的临床比较评价:YAG激光和含有酪蛋白磷酸肽 - 无定形磷酸钙的新清漆治疗牙本质超敏反应性:一项前瞻性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the effect of Nd:YAG laser to that of a new varnish: MI Varnish with RECALDENT (GC), for the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity, with a follow‐up of 6?months. Dentinal hypersensitivity was evaluated using a new thermal test never before used on dental tissue. Materials and Methods A split‐mouth design was used where teeth on one side received the same type of treatment. Twelve patients suffering from dentin hypersensitivity were chosen. Fifty‐four teeth were divided into 27 pairs. Twenty‐seven teeth received the Nd:YAG laser treatment, and the 27 contralateral teeth received MI Varnish application. Five parameters were measured, and the measurements were taken before treatment at baseline (T0), after 1?week (T1), 1?month (T2), 3?months (T3), and 6?months (T4) of the application. Air stimulation to obtain the Schiff air score, the score of discomfort according to the visual analog scale (VAS), the tactile score, and the thermal test that determines the minimum cold‐stimulating temperature and the maximum heat‐stimulating temperature were all used to assess sensitivity. Statistical analyses of the data were performed, and the significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05. Exact Fisher tests and Chi‐Square tests were conducted to compare percentages. Results There was a clear decrease in dentin hypersensitivity for both treatments (Nd:YAG laser and MI Varnish) especially between baseline and 1?week, with maintenance of this state through the 6‐month follow‐up period. The difference between the two treatments was not significant, comparing, over time, the Schiff air score, the thermal test, and the VAS; however, the tactile score was significantly improved 6?months after the application of MI Varnish compared to the laser ( p ?=?0.05). Conclusion There was no significant difference between the two treatments, Nd:YAG laser and MI Varnish. Both treatments were effective and reduced dentin hypersensitivity immediately after treatment up to 6?months.
机译:摘要目的本研究的目的是将ND:YAG激光与新清漆的影响进行比较:MI清漆用重新评估(GC),用于治疗牙本质过敏,随访6?个月。使用新的热试验在牙科组织上使用的新热试验评估了牙本质过敏。材料和方法使用分裂口设计,其中一侧齿接收相同类型的处理。选择了12名患有牙本质过敏的患者。五十四颗牙齿分为27对。二十七颗牙齿接受ND:YAG激光治疗,27个对侧牙齿接受MI清漆应用。测量五个参数,并在基线(T0)处理前进行测量,之后1?周(T1),1?月(T2),3?月(T3)和6?月(T4)的应用。空气刺激以获得Schiff Air得分,根据视觉模拟量表(VAS),触觉得分和热试验,以及确定最小冷刺激温度和最大热刺激温度的热试验评估敏感性。进行数据的统计分析,并且显着水平设定为P≤0.05。进行确切的Fisher测试和Chi-Square测试以比较百分比。结果牙本质对治疗(ND:YAG激光和MI清漆)特别有明显减少,特别是基线和1?周,通过6个月的随访期限维护这种状态。两种治疗之间的差异不显着,比较,随着时间的推移,席克夫空气分数,热试验和VAS;然而,与激光相比,MI清漆施用后6次触觉得分显着改善(P?= 0.05)。结论两种治疗不具有显着差异,ND:YAG激光和MI清漆。在治疗后,两种治疗方法都是有效的,并且在治疗后立即降低牙本质过敏,高达6个月。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号