...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of pediatric psychology >Barriers to Recruitment in Pediatric Obesity Trials: Comparing Opt-in and Opt-out Recruitment Approaches
【24h】

Barriers to Recruitment in Pediatric Obesity Trials: Comparing Opt-in and Opt-out Recruitment Approaches

机译:儿科肥胖试验招募的障碍:比较选择和选择退出招聘方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective To compare the efficacy of opt-in versus opt-out recruitment methods in pediatric weight management clinical trials. Methods Recruitment of preschoolers and school-age children across two obesity randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were compared using the same optin recruitment approach (parents contact researchers in response to mailings). Opt-in and opt-out strategies (parents send decline postcard in response to mailings if they do not want to participate) were then compared across two preschool obesity RCTs. Results Opt-in strategies yielded a significantly lower overall recruitment rate among preschoolers compared with school-age children. Among preschoolers, an opt-out strategy demonstrated a significantly higher overall recruitment rate compared with an opt-in strategy with the main advantage in the number of families initially contacted. Conclusions Opt-out recruitment strategies may be more effective in overcoming the barriers of recruitment in the preschool age-group because it does not rely on parent recognition of obesity.
机译:目的比较选价与退出募集方法在儿科体重管理临床试验中的功效。方法使用同样的Optin招聘方法(父母联系邮件,父母联系研究人员)进行比较两次肥胖随机对照试验(RCT)的学龄前儿童和学龄儿童。选择加入和退出策略(父母在邮寄时发送拒绝明信片如果他们不想参加),则在两个学龄前肥胖症RCT中比较。结果,与学龄儿童相比,学龄前儿童的整体招聘率明显降低了较低的总招聘率。在学龄前儿童中,与最初联系的家庭数量的主要优势,退出策略表现出明显更高的整体招聘率。结论退出招聘策略可能更有效地克服学龄前年龄集团的招聘障碍,因为它不依靠父母承认肥胖症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号