首页> 外文学位 >Cluster randomized intervention trial to evaluate the impact of the 'opt-out' versus 'opt-in' strategy on the uptake of HIV counseling and testing of tuberculosis patients in the Province of the Eastern Cape, South Africa.
【24h】

Cluster randomized intervention trial to evaluate the impact of the 'opt-out' versus 'opt-in' strategy on the uptake of HIV counseling and testing of tuberculosis patients in the Province of the Eastern Cape, South Africa.

机译:在南非东开普省进行的一项分组随机干预试验,评估了“选择退出”与“选择加入”策略对艾滋病毒咨询和结核病患者检测的接受程度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background. Tuberculosis patients have a high likelihood of HIV infection and can benefit from preventive and clinical interventions, but are often not tested. The current standard of care is that TB patients should be offered HIV counseling and testing; the patient must agree to be counseled, to 'opt-in'. We conducted a cluster-randomized trial comparing the Opt-out Strategy to the standard of care. The Opt-out Strategy provides routine HIV counseling and testing to all new TB patients unless they refuse, 'opt -out'. The primary endpoints were the proportion of new TB patients receiving HIV counseling and testing. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients with positive HIV test results and the proportion prescribed cotrimoxazole and/or referred to HIV care.; Methods. We randomized 20 TB clinics in the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan Municipality of the Eastern Cape to the Opt-out Strategy or the standard of care. The TB nurses in all study clinics received HIV counseling and testing training from the municipal health department and training in the use of an HIV Counseling and Testing Register introduced by the study team. The TB nurses in the 10 clinics allocated to the intervention received an additional 2-day training in the Opt-out Strategy.; Results. Data were collected on 754 eligible adult (≥18 years) TB cases covering a 10-week period. A mean of 23% versus 8.7% of the TB cases in the intervention versus control clinics received HIV counseling (t-test, p = 0.03), and 22.4% versus 7.7% received HIV testing (t-test p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in the proportion of patients with a positive HIV test result (36.9% vs. 42.6%), cotrimoxazole prophylaxis (29.6% vs. 33.3%) and referral for HIV care (36.9% vs. 16.7%) between study arms.; Conclusion. Use of the Opt-out Strategy resulted in a significant improvement in the proportion of TB cases counseled and tested for HIV, although uptake overall was still low. Pragmatic, cluster-randomized studies carried out in the public sector can inform policy decisions.
机译:背景。结核病患者极有可能感染艾滋病毒,可以从预防和临床干预措施中受益,但通常未经测试。当前的护理标准是应为结核病患者提供艾滋病毒的咨询和检测;患者必须同意接受咨询才能“选择加入”。我们进行了一项集群随机试验,比较了“退出策略”与护理标准。选择退出策略向所有新结核病患者提供常规的艾滋病咨询和检测,除非他们拒绝“选择退出”。主要终点是接受艾滋病毒咨询和检测的新结核病患者的比例。次要结果包括艾滋病毒检测结果呈阳性的患者比例和开立考特莫唑和/或转介艾滋病毒治疗的比例。方法。我们将东开普省纳尔逊·曼德拉大都会区的20 TB诊所随机分配到“退出策略”或护理标准。所有研究诊所的结核病护士均接受了市卫生部门的艾滋病毒咨询和检测培训,并接受了研究小组介绍的艾滋病毒咨询和检测记录的使用培训。分配给该干预措施的10个诊所的结核病护士接受了为期2天的“退出策略”培训。结果。收集了754个合格的成年人(≥18岁)结核病病例的数据,涵盖了10周的时间。在干预与对照诊所中,平均23%的结核病患者与8.7%的结核病患者接受了HIV咨询(t检验,p = 0.03),而接受艾滋病毒检测的22.4%与7.7%(t检验,p = 0.03)。在研究之间,HIV检测结果呈阳性的患者比例(36.9%比42.6%),cotrimoxazole预防(29.6%比33.3%)和转诊HIV护理(36.9%比16.7%)的比例没有显着差异。武器。;结论。尽管总体上接受率仍然很低,但使用“选择退出策略”可以显着改善接受咨询和检测艾滋病毒的结核病病例的比例。在公共部门进行的务实,集群随机研究可以为政策决策提供依据。

著录项

  • 作者

    Pope, Diana Spies.;

  • 作者单位

    The Johns Hopkins University.;

  • 授予单位 The Johns Hopkins University.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Public Health.; Health Sciences Epidemiology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 291 p.
  • 总页数 291
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 预防医学、卫生学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:39:45

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号