首页> 外文期刊>Journal of occupational health >Promoting physical activity in the workplace: A systematic meta-review
【24h】

Promoting physical activity in the workplace: A systematic meta-review

机译:促进工作场所的身体活动:系统性荟萃评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: Physically active (PA) people have a lower risk of various diseases, compared to those with sedentary lifestyles. Evidence on the effects of PA promoting programs in the workplace is large, and several systematic reviews (SR) and/or meta-analyses (MA) have been published. However, they have failed to consider factors that could influence interventions. This paper aimed to classify and describe interventions to promote PA in the workplace based on evidence from SR/MA. Method: A literature search for SR/MA was done using PubMed, Web of Science, and Science Direct (January 2006-February 2015). Quality assessment of SR/MA was performed using AMSTAR. The PRECEDE-PROCEED model was used for classifying the interventions into predisposing, enabling, reinforcing, environment, and policy domains of focus. Results: Eleven SR/MA included 220 primary studies, of which 139 (63%) were randomized controlled trials. Of 48 interventions identified, 22 (46%) and 17 (35%) focused on predisposing or enabling employees to have more PA, respectively. Of the 22 predisposing factors, 6 were information delivery, 5 were self-motivation, and 11 were program training. The enabling approaches were 12 instrument resources and 5 health service facilities. The reinforcing approaches were 4 incentive and 3 social support. The remaining interventions focused on the environmental development and policy regulation. Conclusions: This systematic meta-review classified interventions using appropriate framework and described the intervention pattern.
机译:介绍:与久坐生活方式的人相比,物理活跃(PA)人的风险较低,患有各种疾病的风险。有关PA促销计划在工作场所的影响的证据很大,并发布了几种系统评论(SR)和/或MEA)。但是,他们未能考虑可能影响干预的因素。本文旨在根据来自SR / MA的证据进行分类和描述促进工作场所的PA的干预措施。方法:使用PubMed,Science,Science Direct(2015年1月)使用PubMed,Science进行了对SR / MA的文献搜索。使用AMSTAR进行SR / MA的质量评估。前进模型用于将干预措施分类为缩小,启用,加强,环境和焦点策略域。结果:110例SR / MA包括220项初级研究,其中139名(63%)是随机对照试验。 48个干预措施,22例(46%)和17(35%)专注于拟议或使员工分别拥有更多PA。在22个诱惑因素中,6个是信息交付,5个是自我激励,11是计划培训。支持方法是12个仪器资源和5个卫生服务设施。加强方法是4个激励和3个社会支持。其余干预措施专注于环境发展和政策监管。结论:这种系统审查分类课程使用适当的框架并描述了干预模式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号