...
首页> 外文期刊>Digital Health >Mobile health interventions to promote physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour in the workplace: A systematic review
【24h】

Mobile health interventions to promote physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour in the workplace: A systematic review

机译:移动健康干预措施,以促进体育活动,减少工作场所的久坐行为:系统审查

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability of mobile health (mHealth) technology (including wearable activity monitors and smartphone applications) for promoting physical activity (PA) and reducing sedentary behaviour (SB) in workplace settings. Methods Systematic searches were conducted in seven electronic databases (MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science and the Cochrane library). Studies were included if mHealth was a major intervention component, PA/SB was a primary outcome, and participants were recruited and/or the intervention was delivered in the workplace. Study quality was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) tool. Interventions were coded for behaviour change techniques (BCTs) using the Coventry, Aberdeen and London – Refined (CALO-RE) taxonomy. Results Twenty-five experimental and quasi-experimental studies were included. Studies were highly heterogeneous and only one was rated as ‘strong’ methodological quality. Common BCTs included self-monitoring, feedback, goal-setting and social comparison. A total of 14/25 (56%) studies reported a significant increase in PA, and 4/10 (40%) reported a significant reduction in sedentary time; 11/16 (69%) studies reported a significant impact on secondary outcomes including reductions in weight, systolic blood pressure and total cholesterol. While overall acceptability was high, a large decline in technology use and engagement was observed over time. Conclusions While methodological quality was generally weak, there is reasonable evidence for mHealth in a workplace context as a feasible, acceptable and effective tool to promote PA. The impact in the longer term and on SB is less clear. Higher quality, mixed methods studies are needed to explore the reasons for decline in engagement with time and the longer-term potential of mHealth in workplace interventions. Protocol registration: The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO: CRD42017058856
机译:目的这一系统审查旨在评估移动健康(MHECHEATH)技术(包括可穿戴活动监视器和智能手机应用)的有效性,可行性和可接受性,用于促进体育活动(PA)并在工作场所设置中减少久坐行为(SB)。方法在七个电子数据库中进行系统搜索(Medline,跑步,Scopus,Embase,Psycinfo,科学网站和Cochrane图书馆)。如果MHECH是一个主要干预组成部分,则包括研究,PA / SB是主要结果,招聘参与者和/或在工作场所交付干预。使用有效的公共卫生实践项目(EPHPP)工具评估研究质量。使用Coventry,Aberdeen和London - Refined(Calo-Re)分类来编码干预措施进行行为改变技术(BCT)。结果包括二十五次实验和准实验研究。研究高度异质,只有一个被评为“强”方法论质量。常见的BCT包括自我监控,反馈,目标设置和社会比较。共有14/25(56%)的研究报告称PA显着增加,4/10(40%)报告久坐时间显着降低; 11/16(69%)研究报告称对二次结果产生重大影响,包括减轻重量,收缩压和总胆固醇。虽然整体可接受性很高,但随着时间的推移,观察到技术使用和接合的大幅下降。结论,虽然方法论质量一般较弱,但在工作场所背景下,MHEALT的合理证据是促进PA的可行,可接受和有效的工具。较长术语和SB中的影响不太清楚。需要更高的质量,混合方法研究需要探讨与工作场所干预措施的时间和长期潜力以及工作场所干预措施下降的原因。议定书注册:审查议定书在Prospero注册:CRD42017058856

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号