首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences >Treatment and outcomes of extrahepatic malignancy incidentally diagnosed during pretransplant evaluation for living donor liver transplantation
【24h】

Treatment and outcomes of extrahepatic malignancy incidentally diagnosed during pretransplant evaluation for living donor liver transplantation

机译:在预留肝移植预防植物评估期间诊断的治疗与结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Abstract Background This study analyzed treatment and outcomes in patients with primary extrahepatic malignancy (EHM) incidentally diagnosed during pretransplant evaluation for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Methods Of 4621 adult patients undergoing LDLT over 19?years, 41 were diagnosed with EHM shortly before LDLT (incidental malignancy group), and 92 had been treated for EHM more than 6?months before LDLT (treated malignancy group). Results Most common EHMs were colorectal, thyroid, and stomach cancers in the incidental malignancy group; and stomach, breast, thyroid, colorectal, and renal cell cancers and lymphoma in the treated malignancy group. Mean interval between EHM diagnosis and LDLT in the incidental malignancy group was 1.5?±?1.6?months. Of the 41 patients in this group, 15 (35.6%), seven (17.1%), and 16 (39.0%) underwent EHM treatment before, during, and after LDLT, respectively, whereas three (7.3%) underwent observation alone. During a mean follow‐up of 70.1?±?50.8?months, six (14.6%) patients showed tumor recurrence, and three (7.3%) died of tumor progression. All recurrences developed in patients with tumor stages higher than the earliest stage. The mean interval between EHM diagnosis and LDLT in treated malignancy group was 79.8?±?79.6?months. During a mean follow‐up of 63.2?±?54.1?months, three (3.3%) patients showed tumor recurrence and one (1.1%) died of tumor progression. The incidence of EHM recurrence was significantly higher ( P ?=?.025), and the overall post‐transplant patient survival rate?was significantly lower ( P ?=?.046), in the incidental malignancy than in the treated malignancy group. Conclusions Only patients with earliest‐stage EHM detected shortly before LDLT are indicated for upfront LDLT combined with peritransplant EHM treatment.
机译:摘要背景本研究分析了偶然侵入性恶性肿瘤(EHM)患者的治疗和结果,偶然被诊断出在预留植物肝移植(LDLT)的预体评价中。方法为4621例接受LDLT超过19岁的患者,在LDLT(偶然恶性组织)之前不久被诊断为EHM,并在LDLT(治疗恶性组治疗治疗恶性组)之前对EHM治疗92个月。结果大多数常见的EHM是偶然恶性肿瘤中的结直肠癌,甲状腺和胃癌;和胃,乳腺,甲状腺,结肠直肠癌和肾细胞癌和肾细胞和淋巴瘤在治疗的恶性肿瘤中。偶然恶性组中EHM诊断和LDLT之间的平均间隔为1.5?±1.6?数月。在该组的41名患者中,15(35.6%),七(17.1%)和16(39.0%)分别在LDLT之前,期间和之后接受了EHM治疗,而三(7.3%)单独进行观察。在平均随访70.1?±50.8?月,六个(14.6%)患者显示肿瘤复发,三(7.3%)死于肿瘤进展。肿瘤阶段患者患者的所有复发高于最早阶段。 ehm诊断和治疗治疗恶性组中的LDLT之间的平均间隔为79.8?±79.6个月。在平均随访63.2?±54.1?月,三个(3.3%)患者表现出肿瘤复发,一(1.1%)死于肿瘤进展。 EHM复发的发病率显着高(P?= 025),以及整个移植后的患者存活率?在偶然恶性肿瘤中显着降低(P?= 046),而不是治疗的恶性肿瘤。结论仅在LDLT之前不久检测到最早阶段EHM的患者,用于预期LDLT与亚烷塑料EHM处理结合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号